Seahawk Sailor
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 22,963
- Reaction score
- 1
[youtube]ibyq_7xMKq0[/youtube]
Throwdown":3qqulc4w said:I question your morality if you'd take Rodgers anywhere near this team unless it's him and his packers getting curb stomped by us
Pete Carroll:
"We're looking for a great competitor. We're looking for a guy that can really carry it when it's tough and make plays when you need it to happen, that affects guys around him in a real positive way because of what he brings."
"There's a lot more to it than just physical stature," Carroll said, continuing to outline his quarterback requirements, "but really, we'd like to have a guy that can run a little bit and complement the running game and do something for us -- get out on the edge and threaten enough to keep the run game that we're so committed to alive and at its best."
Color me blind then, as Wilson has done every bit as good with supposedly less talented Receivers, and Rodgers is NOT as MOBILE as Russell Wilson, he's just NOT.ZagHawk":1755m4id said:I like RW better than the other QBs and he's worked so well for this system (obviously). However, the potential is there for the other QBs to be better than RW, and I think JS and PC could make a player like RG3 play to his full potential. There are also a lot of other factors that make this realistic such as the salary cap.
i.e. If you're not willing to take Rodgers over Wilson, you're blind. Could you imagine the threat of an elite QB like Rodgers (who is also mobile) combined with our current running game. The Seahawks are already great, but they would be SCARY at this point. However, Rodgers cost way more money than Wilson, and therefore you have salary cap issues, which is why if you have a QB like Rodgers (Peyton, Brady) you can't have teams that surround them like this current Hawks team.
But salary cap aside, if we were to just keep the same exact team and trade QBs. Yeah, Luck, Rodgers, maybe even RG3 or Cam would be my picks. I think we still need a mobile QB threat to make the system work. Rodgers is obviously a better passer than RW, Luck I'm still on the fence because of his interceptions. The others have more POTENTIAL than RW and I think our coaching staff could make them greater than what RW is currently doing. That's my 2 cents. I love Russell Wilson, but the OP asked an honest question and I'm giving an honest answer.
volsunghawk":2qfntld3 said:Hell yes, I'd trade QBs!
Rodgers, Luck, Brady, Manning, Foles, Newton... I would trade Tarvaris for any of them.
Throwdown":3csvqegx said:Hell no, are you serious?
Aaron Rodgers is a male with female emotions
Brady & Manning? No
Kaepernick? puhleeze
Newton? I like the guy but hes no Russell God Damn Wilson
Luck? pfft
Griffin? pfft
Russell Wilson is amazing, and I love him.