jammerhawk":1t46rs9h said:
I don't care about anything PFF says. But I do care about a guy earning a starting job without ever showing anything positive in the NFL as a 28 year old. And the money committed here probably pencils him in to be the RT starter.
The real issue I have is that this kind of resource commitment will often negatively impact roster decisions. For example, Justin Britt has been a disaster, and yet he has 32 starts to his name. Had he been a UDFA and played equally as poorly, would he have lasted for 32 starts? How about Cary Williams? Would Cary Williams have ambushed our secondary for as long as he did if not for the financial investment in him?
For that reason, I don't like seeing Seattle put themselves in a situation where they are committed to a player that will most likely be pretty bad. It could cause them to give those players meaningful and damaging reps longer than they would do otherwise.
Barthawk":1t46rs9h said:
Significant money? Two years ago the cap was 20M less than it is now.. so add another 15% less to what Breno was paid in 2014.
I remember us saying we got training camp fodder in 2011 for Kelly Jennings when we got Clinton McDonald.. he turned out pretty ok..
He is getting less than 50% what Sweezy just got.. i think it is an ok deal myself. 28 years old, started multiple games and has not been injury prone. Good signing I think.
I think the JR Sweezy deal was bad too. But that deal didn't force Seattle to sign Webb to starter money.
FWIW, I loved the McDonald trade when it went down (everyone hated Jennings; the deal was almost universally liked).
Breno's numbers were not exactly the same, I just brought him up for a frame of reference with regards to the contract Webb received.