JAGHAWK
New member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
- Messages
- 629
- Reaction score
- 0
Hawkpower":mx1u12vx said:vin.couve12":mx1u12vx said:hawk45":mx1u12vx said:Vin, if Kam's allowed to do what he wants to advance his own monetary goals, why should it bother you that fans also keep their own entertainment goals uppermost and bring out the pitchforks?
I agree with your point about emotion though. Neither side *really* gives a crap about the other if it means impacting their own endgame, so words like loyalty really don't apply.
Except for fans like ivotuk who do feel some loyalty, and if you're going to feel that way you are absolutely right to be pissed that it's not a two-way street.
In other words, fans are fans in their own way. This argument is really about fan A not feeling like fan B. Which is essentially what nearly every thread in the history of sports threads boils down to admittedly.
It's the entitlement that bothers me. Disagreeing with Kam or the Seahawks is to be expected, but thinking their owed something for nothing?
I'm just seeing President Camacho firing off a 60 with monster trucks trying to run over a guy while the crowd goes nuts.
Does the NFL exist, and therefore, does Kam get a paycheck if there are no fans?
And again, you are puffing up a strawman with your arguments. Its not nearly as severe as you paint it out to be. Are some fans frustrated? Sure. But Kam himself is insinuating HE needs an apology, which is ludicrous....so are some frustrated fans going to push back on that?
Yeah. They are.
But Kam exists as he is due to the fans that make it possible. Lets not forget that.
Uncle Si":20m1mcom said:Kam is a fantastic player. I just don't see one player ever making the difference in the outcome of one game.
vin.couve12":34cx753h said:Hawkpower":34cx753h said:vin.couve12":34cx753h said:hawk45":34cx753h said:Vin, if Kam's allowed to do what he wants to advance his own monetary goals, why should it bother you that fans also keep their own entertainment goals uppermost and bring out the pitchforks?
I agree with your point about emotion though. Neither side *really* gives a crap about the other if it means impacting their own endgame, so words like loyalty really don't apply.
Except for fans like ivotuk who do feel some loyalty, and if you're going to feel that way you are absolutely right to be pissed that it's not a two-way street.
In other words, fans are fans in their own way. This argument is really about fan A not feeling like fan B. Which is essentially what nearly every thread in the history of sports threads boils down to admittedly.
It's the entitlement that bothers me. Disagreeing with Kam or the Seahawks is to be expected, but thinking their owed something for nothing?
I'm just seeing President Camacho firing off a 60 with monster trucks trying to run over a guy while the crowd goes nuts.
Does the NFL exist, and therefore, does Kam get a paycheck if there are no fans?
And again, you are puffing up a strawman with your arguments. Its not nearly as severe as you paint it out to be. Are some fans frustrated? Sure. But Kam himself is insinuating HE needs an apology, which is ludicrous....so are some frustrated fans going to push back on that?
Yeah. They are.
But Kam exists as he is due to the fans that make it possible. Lets not forget that.
So you're owed something right? Your feelings require someone to pay? Awesome! We can be vicarious nutjobs and get something out of it!!!!
Hawkpower":62guyv1h said:Does the NFL exist, and therefore, does Kam get a paycheck if there are no fans?
And again, you are puffing up a strawman with your arguments. Its not nearly as severe as you paint it out to be. Are some fans frustrated? Sure. But Kam himself is insinuating HE needs an apology, which is ludicrous....so are some frustrated fans going to push back on that?
Yeah. They are.
But Kam exists as he is due to the fans that make it possible. Lets not forget that.
There you go with your strawman again.
I didnt say anything about requiring someone to "pay" nor did I say I was owed anything.
You are sneering all over the boards with your entitlement speech. I merely pointed out that the NFL and Kam's salary doesn't exist without the fans.
So players and pompous self righteous message board fans can bite the feeding hand if they want, but don't pretend that the fans don't matter.
BASF":13idpls3 said:Uncle Si":13idpls3 said:Kam is a fantastic player. I just don't see one player ever making the difference in the outcome of one game.
You didn't happen to see the 2004 season where Terreal Bierria pulled a Deion Bailey five times that season?
vin.couve12":3v0xg3x4 said:Hawkpower":3v0xg3x4 said:Does the NFL exist, and therefore, does Kam get a paycheck if there are no fans?
And again, you are puffing up a strawman with your arguments. Its not nearly as severe as you paint it out to be. Are some fans frustrated? Sure. But Kam himself is insinuating HE needs an apology, which is ludicrous....so are some frustrated fans going to push back on that?
Yeah. They are.
But Kam exists as he is due to the fans that make it possible. Lets not forget that.
There you go with your strawman again.
I didnt say anything about requiring someone to "pay" nor did I say I was owed anything.
You are sneering all over the boards with your entitlement speech. I merely pointed out that the NFL and Kam's salary doesn't exist without the fans.
So players and pompous self righteous message board fans can bite the feeding hand if they want, but don't pretend that the fans don't matter.
Im not, but it only goes to a certain extent. It's all about the benjamins.
Hawkpower":20i6gmjc said:vin.couve12":20i6gmjc said:Hawkpower":20i6gmjc said:Does the NFL exist, and therefore, does Kam get a paycheck if there are no fans?
And again, you are puffing up a strawman with your arguments. Its not nearly as severe as you paint it out to be. Are some fans frustrated? Sure. But Kam himself is insinuating HE needs an apology, which is ludicrous....so are some frustrated fans going to push back on that?
Yeah. They are.
But Kam exists as he is due to the fans that make it possible. Lets not forget that.
There you go with your strawman again.
I didnt say anything about requiring someone to "pay" nor did I say I was owed anything.
You are sneering all over the boards with your entitlement speech. I merely pointed out that the NFL and Kam's salary doesn't exist without the fans.
So players and pompous self righteous message board fans can bite the feeding hand if they want, but don't pretend that the fans don't matter.
Im not, but it only goes to a certain extent. It's all about the benjamins.
No fans = No "benjamins"
But of course you know this.
It's never one player winning a game, that just not even a possibility, but one person making the difference between two relatively well matched teams?BASF":2gsl6500 said:Uncle Si":2gsl6500 said:Kam is a fantastic player. I just don't see one player ever making the difference in the outcome of one game.
You didn't happen to see the 2004 season where Terreal Bierria pulled a Deion Bailey five times that season?
vin.couve12":1pcllfhb said:Hawkpower":1pcllfhb said:vin.couve12":1pcllfhb said:Hawkpower":1pcllfhb said:Does the NFL exist, and therefore, does Kam get a paycheck if there are no fans?
And again, you are puffing up a strawman with your arguments. Its not nearly as severe as you paint it out to be. Are some fans frustrated? Sure. But Kam himself is insinuating HE needs an apology, which is ludicrous....so are some frustrated fans going to push back on that?
Yeah. They are.
But Kam exists as he is due to the fans that make it possible. Lets not forget that.
There you go with your strawman again.
I didnt say anything about requiring someone to "pay" nor did I say I was owed anything.
You are sneering all over the boards with your entitlement speech. I merely pointed out that the NFL and Kam's salary doesn't exist without the fans.
So players and pompous self righteous message board fans can bite the feeding hand if they want, but don't pretend that the fans don't matter.
Im not, but it only goes to a certain extent. It's all about the benjamins.
No fans = No "benjamins"
But of course you know this.
Winning = Fans
It's inevitable.
MizzouHawkGal":2xx8jqzb said:Riddle me this...why are you two arguing and attacking each other?
I read your posts and it seems at worst you're talking past one another while actually being in total agreement with each other. Am I off base here?