HawKnPeppa":2r8vs6dt said:Did you not read the OP or just chose to ignore it?
I'm one of the last people around here that will argue with anybody but I will explain my comment.
IMO if a player threatens to not show up when he's expected too, or in fact doesn't show up in an attempt to get the FO to make changes in how he's paid and concessions are made, in this instance they gave into his requests/ demands.
This may or may not have been precedent, I don't know for sure.
I do believe that other players saw how that was handled and most likely feel they can do similar things. That's why I think that it can/ will make things tougher in the future.
Do those other players know that Lynch was only given what was already offered ? I don't know that either.
My comment was based on the fact that I think what took place with Lynch last year or what was perceived to have taken place, is playing a role in what we are seeing now.
Precedent or not precedent, I think the handling of Lynch last year, is having an effect.