hawk45":2omb01id said:
The lack of run game has been frustrating, but this fan is okay, for once, to have guys who can protect the QB who need to improve their run blocking, and not the other way around. Especially if the guys who can protect are at C, RT, and LT (well Okung can run block as well).
There have been excuses on excuses for pass pro, but once you see actual protection you realize that yeah, no, what we saw before did in fact suck. What we saw in GB did not suck at all, even one bit. That's the kind of protection that leaves the QB no excuses if he can't operate.
I'd like to see where the tradeoff takes us.
Like the the 49ers, our offense has always been at its best when it can dominate physically. Seattle got to two Super Bowls with the worst sack rate in the league both years.
I think our current OL is patchwork.
Terry Poole is comparable as a prospect to James Carpenter. There's a reason he was the first OL Seattle drafted this year, they wanted a road grader to replace the road grader they lost. The Hawks probably hoped he could start at LG on day one. But things didn't go as they hoped.
JS name checked Patrick Lewis, not Drew Nowak, after trading Unger. This is another example of the plans laid in March changing by August.
And then you had Britt entering the season at RT, only to change to LG when Pete panicked. I actually think this was the right move, but again, it's not something they were planning for in March.
As a result, you have a line that was very different than the one they planned around building during the offseason. I'm not saying that as a blanket criticism, only to say that the stylistic cacophony within the line was not by design. It is simply the result of Seattle doing the best they can after a series of development setbacks this summer.
All it takes for the OL to fail on a play is if one member of the group fails at his job. This is just as true in the run game as it is in protection. For this reason, you are better off going with five good run blockers or five good pass blockers so that you can assure yourself that at least one of those areas will be solid. Look at the packers for example, just about every one of there starters are good pass blockers. There's no JR Sweezy or Justin Britt mixed into that line who could sabotage that protection. Stylistic consistency matters.
WIlson is a QB who can make due with lesser protection, and you can't really be an elite running team long term without good run blocking. Seattle's lines have been bad, but at least according to FO, they had been top 10 in run blocking every year for a while now. This year, the run blocking looks really really bad. Protection seems improved, but not by enough to offset the loss in the running game.