Sports Hernia":b02p4929 said:
DavidSeven":b02p4929 said:
His tweets really aren't too subtle anymore.
Earlier today:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/DangeRussWilson/status/598913500757364736[/tweet]
Normally, I HATE when folks here try to interpret cryptic tweets, but this isn't really all that mysterious when you read these two together.
I think RW went with the wrong agent, a baseball agent, that is new to the NFL contracts.
If he doesn't sign an extension before the 2015 season, he'll only make 1.5 million for the 2015 season, and then be franchised for the next 2 years if still no deal is reached. This agent is costing him money as soon as this upcoming year if no extension is reached.
I hope he has his old agent on speed dial.
They simply can't go the franchising route. It's just not practical. In fact, in many ways, it would benefit Wilson tremendously. It would be a huge gamble on his part (needs to stay healthy and productive), but if that's how it played out, it would benefit him more than you think.
Think about this: Joe Flacco signed a 6 year deal worth $120M. Only $29M of that was guaranteed. His annual salaries broke down like this:
2013: $6.8M
2014: $14.8M
2015: $14.5M
2016: $28.5M
2017: $31.1M
2018: $24.7M
Two years into his deal, Flacco has counted "only" $21.6M against the cap over two years. Notice how his cap hit escalates dramatically starting in 2016. By giving him a big, long contract, they can spread the guaranteed money out over the life of a deal with a signing bonus, and backload his contract. They'll put off paying him until after the cap goes up.
Now suppose Wilson was franchised. In the first year of his contract, he'd make around $19M. In the second year of his contract, he'd be guaranteed at least a 20% raise (that's the rule for franchising two years in a row). In 2017, we'd be paying him $22.8M. For franchising him for just two years, he'd have made $41.8M (already well beyond what Flacco is guaranteed). Plus, he'd now be a free agent. He could then sign a monster contract on the open market, complete with a huge signing bonus. By the beginning of 2018, he'd have made $41.8M + $30-40M signing bonus + 6-7 year contract.
So from his perspective -- and again, it would be a gamble on his part, because he'd have to stay healthy/productive enough to still warrant a huge contract in a couple years -- it's probably not so bad. Furthermore, from our front office's perspective, it's a nightmare. How are we going to fit $41.8M in salary under the cap in 2016/2017? An extension would allow us to minimize the cap hits up front, when all of the other big contracts (Sherman, Thomas, etc) are on the books.
I can't see it happening. It would be a huge challenge for the front office and would put a big strain on our budget.