theENGLISHseahawk
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 9,977
- Reaction score
- 0
Vincent Jackson or Larry Fitzgerald.
Absolutely crucial for this offense.
Absolutely crucial for this offense.
Erebus":1pst4sda said:Why trade picks to take on an old player with a problematic contract?
I'd rather see what we have with Matthews for a full year.
hangumhi":39rma5fq said:Erebus":39rma5fq said:Why trade picks to take on an old player with a problematic contract?
I'd rather see what we have with Matthews for a full year.
Ditto. Chasing wide receivers with money at this point is asking for trouble. There were far too many times throughout this year when Wilson had to take quick sacks because he couldn't even set his feet on his drop back. Don't make the same mistake a lot of GM's make which is spend a ton of money on skills players without shoring up your O line. Go out and spend money on an O line and you'll see how vastly Richardson, Matthews, Baldwin and Norwood are going to improve.
hangumhi":2rndbu6e said:Erebus":2rndbu6e said:Why trade picks to take on an old player with a problematic contract?
I'd rather see what we have with Matthews for a full year.
Ditto. Chasing wide receivers with money at this point is asking for trouble. There were far too many times throughout this year when Wilson had to take quick sacks because he couldn't even set his feet on his drop back. Don't make the same mistake a lot of GM's make which is spend a ton of money on skills players without shoring up your O line. Go out and spend money on an O line and you'll see how vastly Richardson, Matthews, Baldwin and Norwood are going to improve.
Tech Worlds":2d7qyqqw said:How bout adding a quick passing play designed to gain 3 yards. What a concept.
Killa Kam":3ffctbzb said:I'd love to get a big bodied receiver but I doubt any receiver still in his prime would play in our offense without us having to overpay like crazy. Players like Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson might like the idea of playing for a contender but doubt they want to do it with a discount and at the expense of their stats.
My choice would be some more depth for our d-linw, not stars necessarily but just some more guys to rotate in. Would love to see for Jordan Hill to continue what he started to show this season and Cassius Marsh to break out
I don't think it's as simple as "our o-line sucks." Yes they can improve, but part of the problem has been the total lack of continuity on the line. Another issue is WRs not getting open. And Russ also needs to make decisions faster in some cases.hangumhi":94i9cz6j said:Erebus":94i9cz6j said:Why trade picks to take on an old player with a problematic contract?
I'd rather see what we have with Matthews for a full year.
Ditto. Chasing wide receivers with money at this point is asking for trouble. There were far too many times throughout this year when Wilson had to take quick sacks because he couldn't even set his feet on his drop back. Don't make the same mistake a lot of GM's make which is spend a ton of money on skills players without shoring up your O line. Go out and spend money on an O line and you'll see how vastly Richardson, Matthews, Baldwin and Norwood are going to improve.
Only because we don't have it in our playbook to the point it's executed so poorly. Almost every team in the league can throw a quick short pass to get three yards. For use to convert on third and three with a short pass is like asking for a miracle. Just watch the superbowl again and see how easy the Patriots did it yet how hard it was for us. Maddening that we throw 20 yard passes when we just need a few yards for a fresh set of downs.getnasty":142irlu4 said:Tech Worlds":142irlu4 said:How bout adding a quick passing play designed to gain 3 yards. What a concept.
Malcon Butler likes this idea.