Maybe some new blood will be a good thing. Not saying this system defensively or offensively needs to be blown up and started over, but maybe some new eyes on things will help.
New England, San Diego, Denver in 48 all had multiple drives of 10+ plays against us in the past year. Maybe this needs to be examined. The only reason 48 wasn't close was pressure on Manning put them in a huge hole early. Go look at the drive charts from 48 the Smith INT was like the 10th play of a drive.
When you cannot get pressure with 4 you better have some creativity. Remember when Pete started, we didn't have the athletic LB's like now and we ran the "Bandit" with 7 DB's and used them to blitz. I would think as athletic as our back 7 guys are, we could use them more creatively.
Passing game could use a turn to the 21st century also.
Again not suggesting major changes, but maybe some minor adjusting here and there.
New England, San Diego, Denver in 48 all had multiple drives of 10+ plays against us in the past year. Maybe this needs to be examined. The only reason 48 wasn't close was pressure on Manning put them in a huge hole early. Go look at the drive charts from 48 the Smith INT was like the 10th play of a drive.
When you cannot get pressure with 4 you better have some creativity. Remember when Pete started, we didn't have the athletic LB's like now and we ran the "Bandit" with 7 DB's and used them to blitz. I would think as athletic as our back 7 guys are, we could use them more creatively.
Passing game could use a turn to the 21st century also.
Again not suggesting major changes, but maybe some minor adjusting here and there.