sdog1981
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 3,367
- Reaction score
- 240
JTB":2c0x8o2v said:ivotuk":2c0x8o2v said:nash72":2c0x8o2v said:Seahawk Sailor":2c0x8o2v said:What's the average "bouncing in the playoffs" tier in the John Schneider/Pete Carroll era compared to say, any other era of Seahawks football? Your choice. Any one you want for comparison.
Great another guy who's perfectly content to just make the playoffs because the team stunk in the 90's.
2015 10-6 lost to Panthers 2nd round 31-24 in a game in which the Panthers took their foot off the throttle in the 2nd half or they could have put up 50 on us.
2016 10-5-1 took a severe beating in the 2nd round by the Falcons 36-20.
See a pattern here? If your fine with getting booted in the 2nd round than thats cool, but i'm not. The team wont go any further in the playoffs until the lines fixed and guess what didnt get fixed this season?
Yes, the pattern is, we need to improve our DEFENSE!
Giving up 31 points! 36 points! Opposing teams passing all over the yard!
Sounds to me like we need pass rush and DBs!
Yet in other recent threads, the argument is all about how the offense is the root cause of ruining things for our elite defense. Last 4 playoff losses - Points allowed: 30, 28, 31, 36
The big difference between the 2013 team and the ones since - The defensive line. The 2013 team was legitimately 8/9 deep with quality players. I can argue that the depleted DL depth was the MAIN cause of the SB 49 loss.
Look at those NY Giants Superbowl winning teams. They had scrubs playing in the secondary but the pass rush made up for it. That is why the 13 Hawks were historic. They had an elite pass rush along with an elite secondary.