Scottemojo
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 14,663
- Reaction score
- 1
Ramzfanz, you won't convince many with those numbers. I think Bradford is better than most on here, but he is unlikely to ever be as good as you are hoping.
Lets get away from stats. They assign too much credit/blame for a team sport. All you said in all those paragraphs was If my QB has great players and the right scheme, he could be above average. It isn't really a vote of confidence.
Bradford is an accurate QB with an need for a clean pocket. He has some panic to his game, when things around him begin to break down so does he. He was the QB of the Rams, but never asserted himself as such, kind of taking a back seat to Jackson.
Bradford finally has an OC for two consecutive years. He overcame his tendency to check down to an extent last year. He struggles a bit when playing with a lead, which isn't a great sign in a QB, since play action is his best friend in that situation. He must get better in the red zone. He is exceptional when throwing down the seams, that is his strength, especially hitting sit down routes vs zone coverage. He has yet to play well vs good defenses, even in games the Rams won last year. He can be baited by safeties with regularity. His body language can be less than inspiring.
More spread isn't going to be the boon to Bradford that Rams fans envision. Running a lot of smoke and bubble is probably more for integrating Tavon and Baily than for inspiring Bradford.
You have a good team with young talent, and a QB with both talent a little bit of wench to his game. He is far from inspiring, but it's hard to call him terrible as well. Even if you become a playoff team, there is just something about Bradford that says it will be him fans are blaming when they don't go as far as the overall talent level of the team says they should.
Lets get away from stats. They assign too much credit/blame for a team sport. All you said in all those paragraphs was If my QB has great players and the right scheme, he could be above average. It isn't really a vote of confidence.
Bradford is an accurate QB with an need for a clean pocket. He has some panic to his game, when things around him begin to break down so does he. He was the QB of the Rams, but never asserted himself as such, kind of taking a back seat to Jackson.
Bradford finally has an OC for two consecutive years. He overcame his tendency to check down to an extent last year. He struggles a bit when playing with a lead, which isn't a great sign in a QB, since play action is his best friend in that situation. He must get better in the red zone. He is exceptional when throwing down the seams, that is his strength, especially hitting sit down routes vs zone coverage. He has yet to play well vs good defenses, even in games the Rams won last year. He can be baited by safeties with regularity. His body language can be less than inspiring.
More spread isn't going to be the boon to Bradford that Rams fans envision. Running a lot of smoke and bubble is probably more for integrating Tavon and Baily than for inspiring Bradford.
You have a good team with young talent, and a QB with both talent a little bit of wench to his game. He is far from inspiring, but it's hard to call him terrible as well. Even if you become a playoff team, there is just something about Bradford that says it will be him fans are blaming when they don't go as far as the overall talent level of the team says they should.