chris98251
Well-known member
Actually who is the oldest F.A. QB available, that's who Fisher will be most comfortable with.
Rams interested in trading for Foles?
- Thread starter Maelstrom787
- Start date
tmobilchawker79
New member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 1,263
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe I've missed the point here, but I can't see why having Foles in St. Louis doesn't make them better than a 6 win team. They had practically nothing at QB this year, and they have an improving roster with one of the best front four's in the league.
I'm not rooting for it to happen, we all like St. Louis as the bottom dweller. Just trying to understand what we're talking about. Foles is not an upgrade at QB for them? And I fully expect Bradford to have another hangnail at the season opener and be lost for the season.
I'm not rooting for it to happen, we all like St. Louis as the bottom dweller. Just trying to understand what we're talking about. Foles is not an upgrade at QB for them? And I fully expect Bradford to have another hangnail at the season opener and be lost for the season.
RedAlice
Well-known member
I don't want Foles. If we are going to have a stop-gap, keep B.
Foles is a band-aid, not a solution.
If they trade draft picks for him I will be pissed.
Foles is a band-aid, not a solution.
If they trade draft picks for him I will be pissed.
theENGLISHseahawk
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 9,977
- Reaction score
- 0
Excellent news for us if true.
RedAlice
Well-known member
theENGLISHseahawk":1qlqy5bw said:
SEE! We don't want him.
Hey, are ENGISH and UK Hawk fans friends? Are you by each other in the UK?
Similar threads
