hawksfansinceday1":3aiw2714 said:
Hawk-A-Loogie":3aiw2714 said:
Can someone explain to me why the Bowman recovered fumble could not be reviewed? Thanks in advance.
Kearse was called down by contact (incorrectly). Ends the play right there. Heard the rules committee will review that and may change it.
No. What was said is that you cannot review which team recovers a fumble. You can review IF it is a fumble but not who recovers.
Seattle was ruled to recover as Bowman lost the ball after having possession (they didn't see him holding the ball)
The reason is that it is mainly a big pile if people and it would be so hard to determine. They go with who was called in the field. They will now change it to clarify something along the lines if if a player eatables clear possession without being in the pile if people