seahawksfanatic000
New member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 509
- Reaction score
- 0
It was brought up in the Harvin thread that getting a wr in free agency would be a luxury to our offense, they thought it wasn't necessary like a DE or DT. I however, disagree.
I think that not a lot of people are facing the fact that lynch is not getting any younger. The way he runs, it is possible that this could be one of his last productive years in Seattle. Defenses gameplan for lynch, and this in turn takes the pressure off of the receivers and makes their job easier. Our receivers are adequate in a system where we rush for 2000+ yards in a season. Now, if something happened to our stellar running attack, how much production do you think we will get from our current receivers when they are the primary threat to the defense? This isn't intended as a slap In the face, but our offense would regress a lot with our current guys alone. This offseason, receivers are a large priority, not a "luxury" as some of you think.
I think that not a lot of people are facing the fact that lynch is not getting any younger. The way he runs, it is possible that this could be one of his last productive years in Seattle. Defenses gameplan for lynch, and this in turn takes the pressure off of the receivers and makes their job easier. Our receivers are adequate in a system where we rush for 2000+ yards in a season. Now, if something happened to our stellar running attack, how much production do you think we will get from our current receivers when they are the primary threat to the defense? This isn't intended as a slap In the face, but our offense would regress a lot with our current guys alone. This offseason, receivers are a large priority, not a "luxury" as some of you think.