Russell haterade

[Hawkfish]

Wut? :stirthepot:

[tweet]https://twitter.com/NFLNews/status/1150921496879128576[/tweet]


https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... ayed-with/

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Yeah, Stafford. Got it :2thumbs:

 

[Sgt. Largent]

What do you want him to say, Stafford's his QB.

 

[acer1240]

Just came to post this.

Stafford is no slouch but that is one hell of a hot take from Tate

 

[Jerhawk]

He'll wish Wilson was his QB this year after playing with Eli

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Meh, he can say what he wants. Anyone who actually understands football know who the best QB is he's ever played with.

 

[Chapow]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

 

[John63]

:sarcasm_on:

Wut? :stirthepot:

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... ayed-with/

Does that surprise anyone, remember how and why he left.

 

[Uncle Si]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

This plus the simple fact he's most recently played with Stafford

 

[John63]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

Agreed but that is mnore about the system then the QB

 

[chris98251]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

This plus the simple fact he's playing with Stafford this season

Umm




Golden Tate
#15 WR


New York Giants| Official Team Site

Height: 5-10 Weight: 197 Age: 30

Born: 8/2/1988 Nashville , TN

College: Notre Dame

Experience: 10th season

High School: Pope John Paul II HS [Hendersonville, TN]

 

[Chapow]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

Agreed but that is mnore about the system then the QB

For sure. I still think Stafford is a good QB though. For much of his time in Detroit he hasn't had a very good team surrounding him. He's almost always had at least 1 (sometimes 2) very good to great WR's, but has barely had a running game and his defense is usually mediocre to bad. Hard to have overall team success in that situation.

 

[Uncle Si]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

This plus the simple fact he's playing with Stafford this season

Umm




Golden Tate
#15 WR


New York Giants| Official Team Site

Height: 5-10 Weight: 197 Age: 30

Born: 8/2/1988 Nashville , TN

College: Notre Dame

Experience: 10th season

High School: Pope John Paul II HS [Hendersonville, TN]

Was changed thanks

 

[Sgt. Largent]

Ha, I forgot Golden was traded to NY too.

In that case, TO THE OUTRAGE MOBILE!!!

Considering all the ALLEGED shenanigans rumored to have gone on between Russell and Golden, no one should be surprised with this statement.........and he did have far better stats in Detroit.

 

[SoulfishHawk]

I like Stafford too, but he's no Wilson.

 

[sutz]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

Agreed but that is mnore about the system then the QB

So much this. I think Tate was worried about his "legacy" and wanted to get on a pass heavy offense to generate stats.

He got his one ring with us, though, and Wilson throwing to him. :mrgreen:

 

[MD5eahawks]

The comments that follow that article are funny. Most of those that left a comment actually believe that Stafford is better. That was very entertaining.

No Comparison!

I guess the next thing that will be said is that Jim Caldwell was a better coach than Pete.

 

[Cyrus12]

Hopefully Stafford keeps Tate away from his wife...rumor has it he likes blondes.

 

[John63]

There is not one expert ranking that puts Stafford over Wilson

 

[PlinytheCenter]

He had 90+ receptions 4 seasons in a row with Stafford as his QB. He never had more than 64 in a season with Wilson as his QB (and that was by far his best season in Seattle). I'm not surprised he prefers Stafford to Wilson. For a WR, better stats generally equal bigger paychecks.

It's been said before; "women weaken legs!"