Blitzer88
Active member
I do have to say, love the hustle, but that was a bad int. and that int. did lose us Okung as he got hurt on the return.
Scottemojo":3116nq95 said:Lets not forget 64 was hauling ass too. Hell of an athlete Sweezy is.
Blitzer88":3hv1tbkt said:I do have to say, love the hustle, but that was a bad int. and that int. did lose us Okung as he got hurt on the return.
If you want to play that angle, it also knocked out Okung, probably for a game or two.Hasselbeck":3gpny78x said:Blitzer88":3gpny78x said:I do have to say, love the hustle, but that was a bad int. and that int. did lose us Okung as he got hurt on the return.
If you want to play that angle, it also knocked out their best LB which opened up the running game.
Is that the same play RW hit Dougie with in the SB?sc85sis":1cds5dru said:I can see why both Pete and Russ said the play itself wasn't bad, just the throw. Looking at that all-22 view, if Russ hits Doug on the money, the angle he is running and the defender is leaning gives Doug pretty much no one to stop him from running that into the end zone. 41 might have had a shot, but I think Doug likely would have beaten him.
jkitsune":29riofvd said:It's a bit corny, and I don't mean to wax poetic, but I thought that play was heroic. I get a bit sentimental just watching it. Wilson cleaned up his own mess, and yes it still cost us points, but it would've been really easy to let that go for a pick-6.
Wife and I screamed when he entered the frame. GET 'EM, RUSS!!!
idahohawk":1q9lct48 said:RW immediately reconciled his INT by trucking Borland, rendering him broken for the 2nd half, opening up the run game.