MidwestHawker
New member
Seems about right to me. I expect it to stay at 10 or maybe get to 10.5.
Blitzer88":1xofej22 said:I think thats being kinda generous. Cards have been playing really good of late and have the personnel to give us fits on both offense and defense.
chris98251":2gexebut said:I really don't care about betting lines and fantasy football stats, I look at whats on the line, what the stake is and the heart of the players. Arizona has everything to lose and a embarrassment to avenge. We are at home and in a too comfortable position possibly. Stuff happens and we need to be hungry.
MidwestHawker":3i15asg6 said:chris98251":3i15asg6 said:I really don't care about betting lines and fantasy football stats, I look at whats on the line, what the stake is and the heart of the players. Arizona has everything to lose and a embarrassment to avenge. We are at home and in a too comfortable position possibly. Stuff happens and we need to be hungry.
Umm well betting lines and fantasy football stats have nothing to do with each other, that's like saying "I don't care about jogging or bubble wrap." Betting lines actually have significant predictive value, and years of statistics back that up. Historically, favorites win at the following clips:
PK: 50%
1-2.5 point favorites: 51%
3 point favorites: 60%
3.5 point favorites: 63%
4-6.5 point favorites: 67%
7 point favorites: 74%
7.5-10 point favorites: 76%
10.5-14 point favorites: 81%
14.5+ point favorites: 96%
Source: http://techguyinmidtown.com/2009/09/25/ ... nt-spread/
Unless you think these statistics have somehow been arrived at as some significant coincidence, hand-waving betting lines away is nothing a person should do. The sharp money is the most objective source there is, a lot more than those of us fans who have an emotional stake in things and don't see everything as clearly.
chris98251":3h9i82kx said:I really don't care about betting lines and fantasy football stats, I look at whats on the line, what the stake is and the heart of the players. Arizona has everything to lose and a embarrassment to avenge. We are at home and in a too comfortable position possibly. Stuff happens and we need to be hungry.
:13:MidwestHawker":10vsufqn said:chris98251":10vsufqn said:I really don't care about betting lines and fantasy football stats, I look at whats on the line, what the stake is and the heart of the players. Arizona has everything to lose and a embarrassment to avenge. We are at home and in a too comfortable position possibly. Stuff happens and we need to be hungry.
Umm well betting lines and fantasy football stats have nothing to do with each other, that's like saying "I don't care about jogging or bubble wrap." Betting lines actually have significant predictive value, and years of statistics back that up. Historically, favorites win at the following clips:
PK: 50%
1-2.5 point favorites: 51%
3 point favorites: 60%
3.5 point favorites: 63%
4-6.5 point favorites: 67%
7 point favorites: 74%
7.5-10 point favorites: 76%
10.5-14 point favorites: 81%
14.5+ point favorites: 96%
Source: http://techguyinmidtown.com/2009/09/25/ ... nt-spread/
Unless you think these statistics have somehow been arrived at as some significant coincidence, hand-waving betting lines away is nothing a person should do. The sharp money is the most objective source there is, a lot more than those of us fans who have an emotional stake in things and don't see everything as clearly.
HawkWow":2u8cyvf3 said:Believe me bro... trying to discuss the properties of sports wagering with the majority in here (with few exceptions) is like jogging on bubble wrap: Pointless.
MidwestHawker":z5q0664r said:HawkWow":z5q0664r said:Believe me bro... trying to discuss the properties of sports wagering with the majority in here (with few exceptions) is like jogging on bubble wrap: Pointless.
I know that there are a lot of widespread misconceptions out there. But as someone who believed in the same misconceptions just a couple of years ago, I figure that it's worthwhile to lay the information out for people since they may not be aware of it.
HawkWow":2cty22qw said:Edit: I was unable to tell by looking at the chart, how big of a sample size was used. Perhaps I'm overlooking it, but how many years back did this programmer go back to arrive to this conclusion. I would hate to think that all of these years of racking numbers and creating lines before betting the game, all I had to do was bet the biggest favorite. You're very comfortable with this study?