Seattle vs. Atlanta matchups

Largent80

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
36,653
Reaction score
5
Location
The Tex-ASS
Mr. Stat at it again. Is there a stat for ass kickings?....Because you will need one to look at what happened to your team this Sunday.
 

ball4life34

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Laloosh":3a93cqc9 said:
Falcon fans acting like Seattle fans didn't see Trufant play at the University of Washington.

Hawk_Nation":3a93cqc9 said:
@ Treefiddy...

I REALLY hope that we see Baldwin lined up against Trufant all day. ADB just might have a career day on Sunday if so.

I think he has gotten better.

"Trufant took 979 snaps in 2015. He was targeted just 56 times — the NFL's lowest among CBs who took at least 75 percent of their team's defensive snaps. With that said, Atlanta's pro bowl cornerback still finished the season with 42 combined tackles, 11 passes defensed, two fumble recoveries, one interception and one sack."
 

Largent80

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
36,653
Reaction score
5
Location
The Tex-ASS
Trufant WILL be targeted, and beaten like a mule. RW is so accurate this year.

I actually feel sorry for your team this Sunday.
 

ball4life34

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Largent80":3k0cqzve said:
Trufant WILL be targeted, and beaten like a mule. RW is so accurate this year.

I actually feel sorry for your team this Sunday.

Maybe. It rarely happens though...Trufant is a monster. Definitely can see RW having a big game...our D isn't as bad as the defensive rankings right now.
 

Bobblehead

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
4,248
Reaction score
866
That Atlanta really didn't have to worry about the passing game and lined up to stop the run says something.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,027
Reaction score
1,723
Location
Sammamish, WA
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.
 

treefidy

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Location
Reece's head
hawkfan68":gvua0bs6 said:
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.

You didn't watch the game...

It wasn't Lynch who lost that game. That's ignorant as all hell.
 

Laloosh

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
8,688
Reaction score
0
Location
WA
ball4life34":nhbjch4x said:
Laloosh":nhbjch4x said:
Falcon fans acting like Seattle fans didn't see Trufant play at the University of Washington.

Hawk_Nation":nhbjch4x said:
@ Treefiddy...

I REALLY hope that we see Baldwin lined up against Trufant all day. ADB just might have a career day on Sunday if so.

I think he has gotten better.

"Trufant took 979 snaps in 2015. He was targeted just 56 times — the NFL's lowest among CBs who took at least 75 percent of their team's defensive snaps. With that said, Atlanta's pro bowl cornerback still finished the season with 42 combined tackles, 11 passes defensed, two fumble recoveries, one interception and one sack."

Not sure why you're quoting me. I didn't make a claim one way or the other; simply pointing out that you're all trying way too hard.
 

pcbball12

New member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
736
Reaction score
0
treefidy":3ibnhd3t said:
hawkfan68":3ibnhd3t said:
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.

You didn't watch the game...

It wasn't Lynch who lost that game. That's ignorant as all hell.
Any objective fan watching that game could see how bad Lynch was, regardless of his final stat line. He was a sitting duck in the pocket. As good of an athlete that he is, he was an absolute statue in the pocket with 0 pocket mobility or awareness. He hit his 3rd or 5th step in his drop and just stood there, creating very easy angles for the ends to get home.

On top of that, he just was not processing the game quickly at all. When he did see a guy open and had a chance at a chunk play, he missed high. He was just bad and made it hard for their offense to execute anything other than their quick passing game/dump offs, which also hurt their running game.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,027
Reaction score
1,723
Location
Sammamish, WA
treefidy":3fz1p18k said:
hawkfan68":3fz1p18k said:
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.

You didn't watch the game...

It wasn't Lynch who lost that game. That's ignorant as all hell.

"Actually, it was Lynch who showed he wasn't ready Sunday.

He completed 23 of 35 passes for 223 yards with a late TD to Demaryius Thomas and an interception. He was sacked a half-dozen times, including 3 1/2 times by outside linebacker Vic Beasley, who burned right tackle Ty Sambrailo on three of those takedowns. Lynch's footwork was a mess and his overthrows and misfires ruined any chance the Broncos had of capitalizing on the league's 30th ranked defense, including the NFL's next-to-last pass defense and a patchwork linebacker corps ."

The complete article here - http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...game-center/sp-id-10401000001635726?ocid=iehp

Yeah, Lynch was a major reason why the Broncos lost. Yet they only lost 23-16. But don't let facts get in the way of your arguments. You can ignore them.

Speaking of ignorance - considering your earlier posts, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

We'll see on Sunday who still has 1 loss on their 2016 record.
 

Largent80

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
36,653
Reaction score
5
Location
The Tex-ASS
treefidy":26sphsvv said:
hawkfan68":26sphsvv said:
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.

You didn't watch the game...

It wasn't Lynch who lost that game. That's ignorant as all hell.

Congrats treefondler, you just punched your ticket to obvivion.
 

FOGHORN

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Largent80":rb6ie2da said:
treefidy":rb6ie2da said:
hawkfan68":rb6ie2da said:
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.

You didn't watch the game...

It wasn't Lynch who lost that game. That's ignorant as all hell.

Congrats treefondler, you just punched your ticket to obvivion.

Very mature. Resorted to name calling and even further solidified the nonsense with a misspelled word.

Falcons fans declared homers all the while Seahawks fans declaring their team the greatest ever. I like it.

Stats don't matter when they are coming from the Falcon fans, but are very readily used ammo for Seahawk fans. I can dig it. Love the passion.

Win , lose, or draw I think it will be a much closer game than some on here believe.
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,139
Reaction score
1,077
Location
Taipei
FOGHORN":pwfrucm8 said:
Largent80":pwfrucm8 said:
treefidy":pwfrucm8 said:
hawkfan68":pwfrucm8 said:
Had the Broncos not had a rookie QB playing last week, they would have beaten the Falcons easily. To Falcons credit they deserved to win and they did. The problem with Denver was Lynch and he singlehandedly cost the Broncos the game. This week the Falcons face Russell Wilson. That's the difference. Plus the Seahawks defense is better than the Broncos. The Seahawks have the toughest defense to score on for the past 4 years. I don't have to even look it up to know that. You might be able to throw around for yards but good luck trying to score on the Seahawks. The most points they have given up this year in a single game is 18. 15 of those points in garbage time (after the Seahawks built a 37-3 lead). Seahawks have proved they can score. Altanta hasn't proved they can stop a team with a "competent" QB from scoring on them. Didn't they lose to the Bucs as their one blemish so far? How much points did the Falcon D give up that game? - 31 IIRC. Seahawks have a better offense than the Bucs for sure.

You didn't watch the game...

It wasn't Lynch who lost that game. That's ignorant as all hell.

Congrats treefondler, you just punched your ticket to obvivion.

Very mature. Resorted to name calling and even further solidified the nonsense with a misspelled word.

Falcons fans declared homers all the while Seahawks fans declaring their team the greatest ever. I like it.

Stats don't matter when they are coming from the Falcon fans, but are very readily used ammo for Seahawk fans. I can dig it. Love the passion.

Win , lose, or draw I think it will be a much closer game than some on here believe.

If the Hawks don't double Julio, they may lose by 50 though.
 

treefidy

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Location
Reece's head
hawkfan68":1chsbkjh said:
"Actually, it was Lynch who showed he wasn't ready Sunday.

He completed 23 of 35 passes for 223 yards with a late TD to Demaryius Thomas and an interception. He was sacked a half-dozen times, including 3 1/2 times by outside linebacker Vic Beasley, who burned right tackle Ty Sambrailo on three of those takedowns. Lynch's footwork was a mess and his overthrows and misfires ruined any chance the Broncos had of capitalizing on the league's 30th ranked defense, including the NFL's next-to-last pass defense and a patchwork linebacker corps ."

The complete article here - http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...game-center/sp-id-10401000001635726?ocid=iehp

Yeah, Lynch was a major reason why the Broncos lost. Yet they only lost 23-16. But don't let facts get in the way of your arguments. You can ignore them.

Speaking of ignorance - considering your earlier posts, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

We'll see on Sunday who still has 1 loss on their 2016 record.

You watching Seimian right now?

Yeah, Lynch was not the problem...
 

pcbball12

New member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
736
Reaction score
0
treefidy":1r7duztv said:
hawkfan68":1r7duztv said:
"Actually, it was Lynch who showed he wasn't ready Sunday.

He completed 23 of 35 passes for 223 yards with a late TD to Demaryius Thomas and an interception. He was sacked a half-dozen times, including 3 1/2 times by outside linebacker Vic Beasley, who burned right tackle Ty Sambrailo on three of those takedowns. Lynch's footwork was a mess and his overthrows and misfires ruined any chance the Broncos had of capitalizing on the league's 30th ranked defense, including the NFL's next-to-last pass defense and a patchwork linebacker corps ."

The complete article here - http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...game-center/sp-id-10401000001635726?ocid=iehp

Yeah, Lynch was a major reason why the Broncos lost. Yet they only lost 23-16. But don't let facts get in the way of your arguments. You can ignore them.

Speaking of ignorance - considering your earlier posts, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

We'll see on Sunday who still has 1 loss on their 2016 record.

You watching Seimian right now?

Yeah, Lynch was not the problem...
Ok, it was inept QB play. What does it matter which QB it was that was playing like garbage? Obviously this Denver team is not as good as people thought they were. Can't move the ball against two mediocre to bad defenses two weeks in a row. Both QB's are not good.
 

FOGHORN

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
If the Hawks don't double Julio, they may lose by 50 though.

Haha. If the Falcons don't double Baldwin they may lose by 100. This is fun.
 

RichNhansom

Active member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
4,256
Reaction score
5
treefidy":1nm85gcr said:
hawkfan68":1nm85gcr said:
"Actually, it was Lynch who showed he wasn't ready Sunday.

He completed 23 of 35 passes for 223 yards with a late TD to Demaryius Thomas and an interception. He was sacked a half-dozen times, including 3 1/2 times by outside linebacker Vic Beasley, who burned right tackle Ty Sambrailo on three of those takedowns. Lynch's footwork was a mess and his overthrows and misfires ruined any chance the Broncos had of capitalizing on the league's 30th ranked defense, including the NFL's next-to-last pass defense and a patchwork linebacker corps ."

The complete article here - http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...game-center/sp-id-10401000001635726?ocid=iehp

Yeah, Lynch was a major reason why the Broncos lost. Yet they only lost 23-16. But don't let facts get in the way of your arguments. You can ignore them.

Speaking of ignorance - considering your earlier posts, it's the pot calling the kettle black.

We'll see on Sunday who still has 1 loss on their 2016 record.

You watching Seimian right now?

Yeah, Lynch was not the problem...

He was the problem. One Int and two fumbles added to another fumble is the main reason for the loss. You can slice it anyway you want but 6 sacks in addition to the turn overs is a massive fail.

I haven't looked it up but has Seimian produced 3 turn overs while holding the ball so long that one of the worst pass rushing teams in the league could sack him 6 times?

You are being either ignorant or obtuse trying to say he has performed as well as Seimian. He was the perfect QB for a defense that lacks the ability to pressure the passer. An average Seimian performance and your leaving Mile high with your tail between your legs.

Do you really think the Donks would have started Seimian if the believed Lynch was ready? Do you think they will start him this week if Siemian is cleared to play?
 

treefidy

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Location
Reece's head
pcbball12":12dp0l47 said:
Ok, it was inept QB play. What does it matter which QB it was that was playing like garbage? Obviously this Denver team is not as good as people thought they were. Can't move the ball against two mediocre to bad defenses two weeks in a row. Both QB's are not good.

Well seeing as San Diego is using our game plan to the T to attack their defense, I'd say we might have figured something out.

Siemian is not getting pressured this week, like Lynch did last week. But hey, it was poor QB play last week.

Denver is still going to win this game, solely because of their defense.
 
Top