This team wins. No doubt in MY mind.
Whynotus":1cg2qom0 said:A lot of people are saying 2013 team hands down ... I'm not so sure. 2005 team debatably had the best o-line in history of football. Alexander running left with Strong lead blocking, I don't think the 2013 D-line could stop that from happening, no team in 2005 could, even though they knew it was coming. I say that game would be close, Lot closer than this past Super Bowl.
Whynotus":nwocns7v said:A lot of people are saying 2013 team hands down ... I'm not so sure. 2005 team debatably had the best o-line in history of football. Alexander running left with Strong lead blocking, I don't think the 2013 D-line could stop that from happening, no team in 2005 could, even though they knew it was coming. I say that game would be close, Lot closer than this past Super Bowl.
AF_Hawk":jgw5youb said:Whynotus":jgw5youb said:A lot of people are saying 2013 team hands down ... I'm not so sure. 2005 team debatably had the best o-line in history of football. Alexander running left with Strong lead blocking, I don't think the 2013 D-line could stop that from happening, no team in 2005 could, even though they knew it was coming. I say that game would be close, Lot closer than this past Super Bowl.
Only the left side was awesome. Tobeck, Gray, and Locklear were less than awesome. Yeah the pressure wouldn't be as consistent but it would be enough to disrupt the timing of Matt's throws.
MizzouHawkGal":v8ylyp4a said:C'mon Man this can't be a serious question? While watching the game and Denver all I could think is "these guys are the 2005 Seahawks and we're 2005 Pittsburgh with a better quarterback".
Tony Eason. In otherwords a Trent Dilfer.suppaball":2p2z1aqk said:Yes I totally agree 85 bears did to pats what we just did to Denver. But what will not be mentioned is this Denver team had manning who did 85 pats have?Axx":2p2z1aqk said:the 2013 seahawks are up there with the 85' bears.....
No argument here fact is we would have beat the 1985 Bears or any other team if we got to play by those era's rules and this includes Pittsburgh 1970's or 2002 Tampa Bay.Seahawk Sailor":9z56pch6 said:MizzouHawkGal":9z56pch6 said:C'mon Man this can't be a serious question? While watching the game and Denver all I could think is "these guys are the 2005 Seahawks and we're 2005 Pittsburgh with a better quarterback".
This team would have thumped that 2005 Stealers team too. They had to get help to beat us then, and that was against the team most of us agree we would crush with this team. I don't think they would have beat this team then even with the help.
No argument here fact is we would have beat the 1985 Bears or any other team if we got to play by those era's rules and this includes Pittsburgh 1970's or 2002 Tampa Bay.Seahawk Sailor":87lv4ia1 said:MizzouHawkGal":87lv4ia1 said:C'mon Man this can't be a serious question? While watching the game and Denver all I could think is "these guys are the 2005 Seahawks and we're 2005 Pittsburgh with a better quarterback".
This team would have thumped that 2005 Stealers team too. They had to get help to beat us then, and that was against the team most of us agree we would crush with this team. I don't think they would have beat this team then even with the help.