kidhawk":1mi84ce7 said:
We don't essentially create any space trading Bennett. They may elect to split the dead money over 2 seasons, but it's still $6 million in dead money and he's due (guaranteed as of February 15) $6 million this year. That's a net gain of $0.
Not true. First of all, you can't split dead money over 2 years for traded players, that's only for released players. Secondly, Bennett has a guaranteed base of $6M this season, and with the $2M prorated portion of his SB, his cap charge for the Hawks in 2015 is $8M. If he's traded, the acquiring team is responsible for his base salary, and the full amount of the remaining prorated portion of his SB ($6M) would count towards the Hawks' 2015 cap in the form of dead money. So if he's traded, the Hawks would actually free up $2M against their 2015 cap (less the amount they spend on whomever takes Bennett's roster spot of course).
And "dead money" is never truly dead money unless you're cutting a player with future guaranteed money. In this case, they'd simply be accelerating future cap charges into one lump in 2015. Which would actually be to the Hawks' benefit as they have the space to absorb it in 2015 and would be creating additional space in future years that they have to account for regardless.