Siouxhawk":24j4tn5v said:
Bitter":24j4tn5v said:
Year of The Hawk":24j4tn5v said:
IMHO it is not about not letting people have there opinion it is the excessive opinions that make it less fun. I don't think people are "hurt" by other posts but some people just need to let it go.
The anti Bevell crowd. We get it. You don't like the guy. But almost every post has something interjected about how much he sucks and should be fired. This doesn't even count the posts just dedicated to it. It is like listening to a broken record. It takes the fun and interest out of coming here. No feeling hurt just annoyance.
Nobody is saying he is coach of the year but people also feel the need to defend him with so many attacks (many of my posts). This just adds to the clutter and makes things less fun and interesting.
I like what Jville suggested. Have a particular post dedicated to the "I hate and blame Bevell". Maybe a sticky or even a sub forum for as much traffic as it might get. At least it is an attempt for a solution.
You are only looking at it from one side. I see as many pro bevell thread crapping posts and threads as anti bevell. Quite a few in the argument don't respect the right of other side to have that opinion. From my (probably biased) point of view, the pro bevell people are worse about it than the anti bevell crowd (in general) when it comes to lack of respect. Admittedly, I have allowed myself to become defensive and be drawn into lacking respect for the opposite side myself at times.
Wait a second. So those of us who support the Seahawks are the ones lacking respect? These same Seahawks who have brought us unparreled enjoyment in this era of franchise history? We are the ones showing a lack of respect by sticking up for the coaching staff that has made that happen? I'm afraid you are mistaken.
Also, you do realize that you are besmirching Pete every time with those petulant "fire Bevell" threads. You are basically saying that your wisdom and grasp of the contributions that Bevell makes to this team are superior to his. And don't give me that "loyalty to a fault" rhetoric, because no coach in the competitive NFL would undermine his own status and that of his team by employing any coordinator who he felt was inferior to what the market offers. Pete entrusts Bevell because he's the right fit for the job. Do you really question his ability to make this assessment after being a coach for 40-plus years?
In my opinion telling people they don't support the team, are lesser fans, lack football knowledge, etc. for not supporting Bevell is disrespectful. The disrespectful part isn't in your opinion, it is in the complete dismissal of the other side and treating people like idiots because they have that opposite opinion (again I have gotten defensive at times and been guilty of this myself.)
I have stated my opinion several times that some of it is Pete's responsibility for apparently not holding his coaches to the same standard as his players. Maybe it is him just being "loyal to a fault", maybe he wants a lacky in that position, maybe he is just so arrogant that he can't see the potential being wasted. Honestly I don't know what it is. Despite this flaw (among others such as clock management and awful replay judgement), I still like what Pete brings to the team.
What I do know is the primary purpose of a football team is to entertain its fans and even in some wins I find myself not entertained way to often. Not because the game is close, but because of my perception (right or wrong) of how the offense is handled. And I am far from being alone.