Uncle Si
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 20,596
- Reaction score
- 3
Let's not make this a discussion on which state sucks more, and why.
Cyrus12":3jjyxxv0 said:To answer the question...I dont like either team...but from news reports I saw Seattle fans and GB fans were getting along fairly well at the local drinking holes before the game. Go Titans!
94Smith":xnjocved said:Darn right we didn't want to face you guys again. Russell Wilson is amazing at avoiding pressure and this negates our biggest defensive advantage, pass rush
SanDiego49er":2gkt16yb said:94Smith":2gkt16yb said:Darn right we didn't want to face you guys again. Russell Wilson is amazing at avoiding pressure and this negates our biggest defensive advantage, pass rush
Aaron Rodgers can't out run our pass rush. We will get to him just as we did in the last game.
SoulfishHawk":67zbdnoy said:It's nice to see that SOME 49ers fans can actually acknowledge that the Hawks would have had a real shot next week. But, the Pack played better. And the Hawks dug their own hole in the 1st half, AGAIN.
SoulfishHawk":1txb8g4c said:It's nice to see that SOME 49ers fans can actually acknowledge that the Hawks would have had a real shot next week. But, the Pack played better. And the Hawks dug their own hole in the 1st half, AGAIN.
Sports Hernia":16l6gnbc said:This. Holding my nose and rooting for Erin, which makes me feel like a dirty hooker.Seanhawk":16l6gnbc said:Neither. I like neither. Go AFC.
No offense to dirty hookers.
Marvin49":1waxnvtr said:SoulfishHawk":1waxnvtr said:It's nice to see that SOME 49ers fans can actually acknowledge that the Hawks would have had a real shot next week. But, the Pack played better. And the Hawks dug their own hole in the 1st half, AGAIN.
I don't want this to come off as disrespect for the Packers because they can certainly win the game, but I don't think I'd have survived Niners-Seahawks round 3. I don't think I've ever deviated from that. I wanted no part of that game.
That can easily be viewed as disrespect toward the Packers. Its really not. It's much more about NOT wanting to play the Seahawks than WANTING to play GB.
PackerNation":2fub7zcx said:Marvin49":2fub7zcx said:SoulfishHawk":2fub7zcx said:It's nice to see that SOME 49ers fans can actually acknowledge that the Hawks would have had a real shot next week. But, the Pack played better. And the Hawks dug their own hole in the 1st half, AGAIN.
I don't want this to come off as disrespect for the Packers because they can certainly win the game, but I don't think I'd have survived Niners-Seahawks round 3. I don't think I've ever deviated from that. I wanted no part of that game.
That can easily be viewed as disrespect toward the Packers. Its really not. It's much more about NOT wanting to play the Seahawks than WANTING to play GB.
I get it completely. Green Bay matches up very well with the Seahawks, not so much with the 49ers. Hopefully our coaches and players learned something the first time we met and they plan accordingly. Still, how do you cover Kittle??
knownone":3c20s2px said:Let's look at this last game. The Packers have been incredibly fortunate from a health perspective all season. They just struggled to beat a Seattle team with the 2nd most injuries in the league. They don't really have a legitimate receiving option outside of Adams, and their defense is ranked 31st in adjusted yards given up to running backs. On top of that, Seattle's 28th ranked defense made GB's running game a non-factor, and for the most part they held Rodgers in check.
The Niners run a variation of the Seahawks defense and they run it at a much higher level. So if Seattle could slow down the Pack's rushing attack, the Niners will cripple it. The Niners run the ball as well or better than anyone, and If the Packers can't stop them from running, the game won't even be close.
I don't see how the Packers win this game. They don't have the weapons on offense to match the Niners point for point, and they don't have a defense that can hang for 4 quarters without wearing down.