volsunghawk":jpbnc5ix said:
But, you know, at the same time I think it's fair to voice some concerns. We had GREAT field position all night and still had 9 three-and-outs. In the 3rd quarter, we started at our 44, the 50, and our 40 and had absolutely nothing to show for it other than giving Washington terrible field position. And yes, I know that field position is important, but don't you think that starting with that field position with the guys we have at the skill positions should result in something other than a zero on the scoreboard over those three drives? I think one can be grateful for the win while at the same time being a bit concerned over a stretch like that happening again against a higher caliber opponent.
I'm not concerned, personally.
The officiating was pretty bad and it definitely had a huge impact on Seattle's offense. When that wasn't hurting Seattle, the drops were. It's very unlikely we'll see another game this season with so many drops or such poor officiating. With the more "hands off" officiating Seattle enjoyed vs. Green Bay and Denver, they probably end this game with 37 points.
Even with the refs calling the game like they had money on it, Seattle still averaged 6.4 yards per play, and they did beat the Vegas spread by 3 points despite allowing the late TD.
The kind of game that would concern me is one where Seattle looks anemic on offense. Seattle looked pretty much unstoppable on offense when they weren't being screwed our screwing themselves. The cold streak with the five straight three and outs is just momentum at work, but outside of that mini-cold streak Seattle's offense looked terrific. There are mini-cold spells by most offenses in most games. That's all this was, IMO.
As Tical said, it's probably a good thing to win this game a bit closer than we might have liked. It helps keep Seattle focused for a huge game next week against Dallas who's riding a 4 game win streak.