Honest question.
If you look at the Raiders tape many times last year when they thought they was over matched on the o-line or they just wanted to run it down your throats they went with a extra o-lineman. 6 on the field every play and they did it a bunch run or pass.
While not sexy and limits their play book it WORKED. If Pete really does refuse to get rid of the real problem imo (bev/cable) why can't we do this more for pass plays and run plays?
Mix in some read option/quit hitters/the run. It would help our horrible line a ton in pass pro and run blocking.
Why use Jimmy to chip when he can't chip for crap, why use Jimmy to block when he can't block for crap and just put in a 6th lineman and run 3 WR sets with Jimmy as a WR more than a TE?
Your thoughts?
If you look at the Raiders tape many times last year when they thought they was over matched on the o-line or they just wanted to run it down your throats they went with a extra o-lineman. 6 on the field every play and they did it a bunch run or pass.
While not sexy and limits their play book it WORKED. If Pete really does refuse to get rid of the real problem imo (bev/cable) why can't we do this more for pass plays and run plays?
Mix in some read option/quit hitters/the run. It would help our horrible line a ton in pass pro and run blocking.
Why use Jimmy to chip when he can't chip for crap, why use Jimmy to block when he can't block for crap and just put in a 6th lineman and run 3 WR sets with Jimmy as a WR more than a TE?
Your thoughts?