TheLegendOfBoom
Well-known member
Future talk here.
Just curious.
What are your thoughts on who succeeds Carroll?
Just curious.
What are your thoughts on who succeeds Carroll?
TheLegendOfBoom":1hfrzg1k said:Future talk here.
Just curious.
What are your thoughts on who succeeds Carroll?
Seymour":2p0oseop said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3..
Seymour":3awlmqz0 said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3.
Carroll and crew likely will be gone within 2 years IMO. Where do we go from there? anywhere that is the fastest way from Cable and Bevell. In Paul we must trust.
hawknation2017":ve93l6n7 said:Perhaps David Shaw would be persuaded to leave Stanford for a lot of money and control. Or maybe Chris Peterson gets tired of the recruiting process.
Sgt. Largent":1tymz7bv said:Seymour":1tymz7bv said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3..
I guess my definition of decline is different than yours. No team that goes 10-6 or better and wins playoff games should be considered in a "decline."
To me decline means beginning to miss the playoffs, which is entirely possible this year. So we'll see.
Seymour":dvuygltk said:Sgt. Largent":dvuygltk said:Seymour":dvuygltk said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3..
I guess my definition of decline is different than yours. No team that goes 10-6 or better and wins playoff games should be considered in a "decline."
To me decline means beginning to miss the playoffs, which is entirely possible this year. So we'll see.
And to me, it is more about how well you did with the talent you had on your roster.
We have 9 or 10 pro bowlers.
Sgt. Largent":121qiukt said:Seymour":121qiukt said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3..
I guess my definition of decline is different than yours. No team that goes 10-6 or better and wins playoff games should be considered in a "decline."
To me decline means beginning to miss the playoffs, which is entirely possible this year. So we'll see.
Seymour":2iqoy2l4 said:Sgt. Largent":2iqoy2l4 said:Seymour":2iqoy2l4 said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3..
I guess my definition of decline is different than yours. No team that goes 10-6 or better and wins playoff games should be considered in a "decline."
To me decline means beginning to miss the playoffs, which is entirely possible this year. So we'll see.
And to me, it is more about how well you did with the talent you had on your roster.
We have 9 or 10 pro bowlers.
Sgt. Largent":2gquqlw7 said:Seymour":2gquqlw7 said:Sgt. Largent":2gquqlw7 said:Seymour":2gquqlw7 said:Newsflash!
That "slow decline" started in 2015 and we are in year 3..
I guess my definition of decline is different than yours. No team that goes 10-6 or better and wins playoff games should be considered in a "decline."
To me decline means beginning to miss the playoffs, which is entirely possible this year. So we'll see.
And to me, it is more about how well you did with the talent you had on your roster.
We have 9 or 10 pro bowlers.
We HAD 9 or 10 pro bowlers, as in past tense.
If a popularity contest where fan vote is your measuring stick for evaluating roster talent, you need to come up with a better measuring stick.