Darrell Taylor, why he struggled?

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,626
Reaction score
6,783
Location
SoCal Desert
Can someone knows the game explain why Darrell Taylor struggled last season? Looked like he struggled against runs, and sort of developing into a situational rusher.

What went wrong?
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
5,776
Reaction score
1,726
I'm not an evaluator, but my perspective is he wasn't disciplined in maintaining the edge early in the season. His tendency was to rush up field and then get pushed outside by the tackle on a run play, basically running himself out of the play.
 

bileever

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
1,876
I think that Taylor suffered from the switch to the 3-4 defense. We just did not have the personnel to run that scheme effectively. Whether he was playing defensive end or outside linebacker, he had more run responsibility in the 3-4, and did not do well there. According to PFF, where he was 94th among edge defenders, he was particularly bad against the run, with a 39.9 rating. That put him in the bottom 3 or 4 of all players at his position. He was actually okay as a pass rusher, with a 73.4 rating, which puts him at about number 26th in that category.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,913
Reaction score
1,102
I think he would do better on a team that does a better job of using a Wide 9.
But it looks like the switch to 3-4 also really hurt his effectiveness.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,269
Reaction score
1,652
For me, Darrell Taylor's career start is reminiscent of the first two years of Frank Clark's career. This will be Taylor's 3rd year. So it remains to be seen if he will grow beyond that of a wide nine specialist. I'd like to think he could yet develop into a full time player.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
8,813
Reaction score
2,690
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
I remember Schneider saying we would have taken him in the first round if Jordyn Brooks hadnt been there. Thank Jeebus they redeemed themselves for that draft last year.
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,626
Reaction score
6,783
Location
SoCal Desert
Taylor didn't seem to have height, weight, or athleticism issues, to my untrained eyes, he just didn't look to be at the right place at the right time, could it be it's mostly skill or mindset problem?
 

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
448
Reaction score
441
I think that Taylor suffered from the switch to the 3-4 defense. We just did not have the personnel to run that scheme effectively. Whether he was playing defensive end or outside linebacker, he had more run responsibility in the 3-4, and did not do well there. According to PFF, where he was 94th among edge defenders, he was particularly bad against the run, with a 39.9 rating. That put him in the bottom 3 or 4 of all players at his position. He was actually okay as a pass rusher, with a 73.4 rating, which puts him at about number 26th in that category.
The whole defense suffered from the switch to a 3-4, not just Taylor. I don't know if it was a problem learning the new scheme or if the players were physically unable to play a 3-4 (probably a bit of both). In Taylor's case, I think it was a problem understanding his responsibilities, especially when it comes to setting the edge against the run. For Poona Ford, I'm not sure he can physically do what's required of a 3-4 DE. I think the same is true about Quinton Jefferson.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,298
Reaction score
5,315
Location
Kent, WA
The whole defense suffered from the switch to a 3-4, not just Taylor. I don't know if it was a problem learning the new scheme or if the players were physically unable to play a 3-4 (probably a bit of both). In Taylor's case, I think it was a problem understanding his responsibilities, especially when it comes to setting the edge against the run. For Poona Ford, I'm not sure he can physically do what's required of a 3-4 DE. I think the same is true about Quinton Jefferson.
TBH, Taylor's disappointing performance pre-dates 2022. 🤷‍♂️
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,243
Reaction score
3,086
Location
Spokane, WA
My armchair analysis:

As previously stated, his inability to set the edge and rush way upfield took himself way out of the play.

He's overall not physically dominant, or even strong, for that matter. He had poor block shedding, and only one effective pass rush move: the speed rush.

He's very poor with his hands. He seems to use them primarily for dipping and getting low to the ground, which makes him an easy target to get pancaked and taken to the ground. He needs to develop either a spin move, bull rush, swim, something. Anything. He literally gets stood up and is unable to disengage when he's being blocked.

The scheme may have something to do with it. But his lack of strength, moves, and an overall low football IQ makes him a liability on 1st and 2nd down. If it's 3rd and long, he can probably make a play. Otherwise, he's better served on the sidelines.
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
Square peg, round hole. What else is new.

The Seahawks, talent wise are mid on defense in the front 7, but the coaches do such a horrible job of fitting things to their players in the front 7, it makes them look way worse than what they are.

Put Darrell Taylor on the Eagles and he would be amongst the league leaders in sacks, while being considered one of the best DEs in football.

On the Seahawks? He's considered a disapointment.
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,626
Reaction score
6,783
Location
SoCal Desert
Square peg, round hole. What else is new.

The Seahawks, talent wise are mid on defense in the front 7, but the coaches do such a horrible job of fitting things to their players in the front 7, it makes them look way worse than what they are.

Put Darrell Taylor on the Eagles and he would be amongst the league leaders in sacks, while being considered one of the best DEs in football.

On the Seahawks? He's considered a disapointment.
Everytime I read your post, the conclusion is FIRE PETE and JODI or however you spells her name.
 

Mase

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
757
Reaction score
296
-- Yeah, let's give up on trying to rebuild a defense because it's too hard, takes too long and it makes Darrell Taylor look bad. Taylor is a one trick pony. He is an edge rusher, and a very good one, with low shoulders and bend. But I believe he prioritizes that upfield push to the detriment of all else. I don't think that it's a coincidence that although he was showing that pass rush early in the year, suddenly he wasn't getting as many snaps.

-- Maybe it was a business decision, as sacks = $$$. Or it was just what he was more comfortable doing. But simply put, learn your job, do your job, or move on.

Mase
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,840
Reaction score
10,286
Location
Sammamish, WA
Square peg, round hole. What else is new.

The Seahawks, talent wise are mid on defense in the front 7, but the coaches do such a horrible job of fitting things to their players in the front 7, it makes them look way worse than what they are.

Put Darrell Taylor on the Eagles and he would be amongst the league leaders in sacks, while being considered one of the best DEs in football.

On the Seahawks? He's considered a disapointment.
Death, Taxes and Fade takes.............Pete is Satan. We get it already man.
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
19,050
Reaction score
7,900
Location
Sultan, WA
I think he would do better on a team that does a better job of using a Wide 9.
But it looks like the switch to 3-4 also really hurt his effectiveness.

I assume by Wide 9 you guys mean everyone on the line minus two safeties back?

Sincerely,

Not an X's and O's Guy
 

DarkVictory23

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Messages
1,171
Reaction score
1,791
I assume by Wide 9 you guys mean everyone on the line minus two safeties back?

Sincerely,

Not an X's and O's Guy
It basically means lining up your edge rusher very wide on the LOS to try and get a speed rush into the backfield. Think of it as the technique every beginning Madden player uses to try and get sacks.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
5,776
Reaction score
1,726
Taylor lost snaps to Boye Mafe after the first three or four games because Taylor lost edge contain far too many times. Mafe did better containing the edge.
 

AgentDib

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
5,471
Reaction score
1,240
Location
Bothell
Taylor was well above average last year as a situational pass rusher. He started off as a complete liability against the run but did improve as the season went on. Other than week 15 against SF where he got pulled again he was decent over the last two months. His tackling has also improved steadily over time.

I would argue that if anything the "switch to a 3-4" should be favorable for a guy like Taylor who can win on speed but doesn't have enough physicality yet. You still need to tackle in a 4-3. Irvin had more solo tackles (31) in 2013 than any of our other front guys and he only played in 12 of 16 games.

Taylor needs to keep hitting the weight room and he needs more experience. It may never turn around for him and that happens to many, but there are also plenty of guys who have had made that step before. Crosby went from a liability like Taylor in 2020, to a decent run defender in 2021, to an absolute monster in 2022 where he led the entire NFL in solo tackles and was third in forced fumbles.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,269
Reaction score
1,652
I assume by Wide 9 you guys mean everyone on the line minus two safeties back?

Sincerely,

Not an X's and O's Guy

Picture1.0.png


The wide 9 lines up on the outside shoulder of the tight end or where the tight end would be if he is on the same side. From there the wide 9 rush end has more of a straight shot (less bend) at the quarterback.
 

JPatera76

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
6,297
Reaction score
4,719
Wasn’t DT Last yr working with Avril a lot? What happened with that??
 
Top