hawkfan68
Well-known member
It is a stupid argument in your opinion but it is a fact the Seahawks were 7-9 before Russell Wilson became the QB (under Pete Carroll). Whether you think it’s stupid doesn’t change the facts. In 2010 they finished 7-9 and in 2011 again 7-9 (this with Lynch and LOB). However in Russell’s rookie season they finished 11-5 and went to the divisional round of the playoffs. It wasn’t only Russell who is reason for the improvement but he was one of the reasons among many including PC/JS, LOB, Lynch, Miller, ADB, etc.I can agree with that but my issue is with people who use the stupid argument of seahawks were 7-9 before russell came and say the seahawks were nothing without him. Also, there are people that argue that he carried the Seahawks when he really didnt.
Last edited: