hawkfannj":1o5siq19 said:
Lynch is a once in a generation RB that didn't need a conventional OLine .really that's not a plan that's called getting lucky.
So, by that, are we to assume that, as fantastic as Marshawn Lynch was, Shaun Alexander was WAY MORE money and the Seahawks a lot more "LUCKY" when they were anywhere close to the Goal Line.....Hmmm, could it have been that we had a FANTASTIC O-LINE?
Some cohesion on the O-Line would be a good thing, no?
I'm not saying that Daryl Bevell isn't without some faults, but it's not entirely on him, as he's not the Offensive Line guru that Tom Cable is touted to be....The SAME Tom Cable O-Line that Bevell has at his disposal when formulating, and drawing up plays.
As bad as the O-Line was at their blocking assignments, could you imagine Bevell trying to get them into 'Attack Mode'?
A lot of the posters in here are carrying around the notion, that Russell Wilson, & our Running Backs don't really need much more than a "Bare Minimum" production O-Line....And then question what's wrong with RW, and why he seemed to have regressed so much in '2016'......The answers are right in front of them, but it's just a lot easier to lay it all on Daryl Bevell as the culprit, but it is a lazy analysis..........Pete KNOWS.