kearly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,975
- Reaction score
- 0
Hasselbeck, before you try too hard to serve crow, Luck's numbers are skewed dramatically by two huge games which came against dumpster fire teams that are currently a combined 1-9. In his other games, he's basically been the same guy he's always been. A QB with high passing volume and sub-par efficiency.
Luck is over-rated. Most people think he's better than Wilson and/or the best QB of his generation. To anyone with an ounce of common sense he's clearly not, but at the same time, he's very talented and might be the only QB in the NFL who can fit seamlessly into ANY offense. Andrew Luck is good. Andrew Luck is over-rated. It's possible to be both good and over-rated at the same time. Most things that are over-rated tend to be good things.
If anyone is saying they don't think Andrew Luck is good, they are being silly. His ability to keep his team in games alone is enough for him to be a good player. I think people are reacting to Luck being over-rated, but it's not like anyone is comparing Andrew Luck to Tim Tebow or John Skelton.
Luck is over-rated. Most people think he's better than Wilson and/or the best QB of his generation. To anyone with an ounce of common sense he's clearly not, but at the same time, he's very talented and might be the only QB in the NFL who can fit seamlessly into ANY offense. Andrew Luck is good. Andrew Luck is over-rated. It's possible to be both good and over-rated at the same time. Most things that are over-rated tend to be good things.
If anyone is saying they don't think Andrew Luck is good, they are being silly. His ability to keep his team in games alone is enough for him to be a good player. I think people are reacting to Luck being over-rated, but it's not like anyone is comparing Andrew Luck to Tim Tebow or John Skelton.