Ouch (but funny/sad but true)ctrcat":2vljgvy1 said:The latest stats I found show the average 6th round pick playing in a little more than 32 games and starting 11 games in a career. On the bright side that's more than Percy gave the Hawks.
Zebulon Dak":16dkipim said:Godspeed Percy!!
Hasselbeck":27s7h7yd said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Hasselbeck":2yfm6z4m said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Zebulon Dak":34tg2lf0 said:Hasselbeck":34tg2lf0 said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Fleeced. All we got is a stupid Lombardi, a fulfilled lifelong dream and the memories to go along with it. And they got... wait, what did they get? :229031_confused2:
Zebulon Dak":2ulgirc0 said:Hasselbeck":2ulgirc0 said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Fleeced. All we got is a stupid Lombardi, a fulfilled lifelong dream and the memories to go along with it. And they got... wait, what did they get? :229031_confused2:
hawk45":3jg1p36b said:Zebulon Dak":3jg1p36b said:Hasselbeck":3jg1p36b said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Fleeced. All we got is a stupid Lombardi, a fulfilled lifelong dream and the memories to go along with it. And they got... wait, what did they get? :229031_confused2:
Right and Percy was the key to that Lombardi team going all the way. Wait...
hawknation2014":3nk7aijj said:Zebulon Dak":3nk7aijj said:Hasselbeck":3nk7aijj said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Fleeced. All we got is a stupid Lombardi, a fulfilled lifelong dream and the memories to go along with it. And they got... wait, what did they get? :229031_confused2:
Let's be honest now. The trade for Harvin contributed more to lowering the probability of a potential dynasty (by giving up a First Round pick and $18 million and saddling the team with $9 million in dead money) than it did to winning the Lombardi.
hawk45":34o2qxzg said:hawknation2014":34o2qxzg said:Zebulon Dak":34o2qxzg said:Hasselbeck":34o2qxzg said:lol unreal. Man did the Vikes fleece us.
Fleeced. All we got is a stupid Lombardi, a fulfilled lifelong dream and the memories to go along with it. And they got... wait, what did they get? :229031_confused2:
Let's be honest now. The trade for Harvin contributed more to lowering the probability of a potential dynasty (by giving up a First Round pick and $18 million and saddling the team with $9 million in dead money) than it did to winning the Lombardi.
Red, Clem, Tate, it isn't a great stretch to posit that Harvin's $$$ were a factor in losing all of those guys.
That's not negative. If we were talking Tate here then yeah we could say he helped greatly in getting to the dance and winning it all. That just does not hold any water with Harvin. So we gave up a lot for a little. That's just facing facts.Zebulon Dak":36n3rop3 said:You guys are so negative.
hawknation2014":9st6vgn0 said:In my experience, WRs are many times the most out-of-control players on a team.
Obviously, not all receivers are cancerous prima donnas whose inability to control their outbursts ends up hurting their careers. But that label does apply to many receivers-- at a seemingly higher rate than any other position.
Anyone care to speculate on why that is? Is it the "give me the ball more" mentality that they need to have to get to this level? Is it the inordinately hard hits to the head? (I'm joking . . . kind of.)
hawk45":3v4ffgrz said:That's not negative. If we were talking Tate here then yeah we could say he helped greatly in getting to the dance and winning it all. That just does not hold any water with Harvin. So we gave up a lot for a little. That's just facing facts.Zebulon Dak":3v4ffgrz said:You guys are so negative.
Are you seriously saying that you believe we do not win the Superbowl without Percy Harvin last year?
Zebulon Dak":1qnorxte said:hawk45":1qnorxte said:That's not negative. If we were talking Tate here then yeah we could say he helped greatly in getting to the dance and winning it all. That just does not hold any water with Harvin. So we gave up a lot for a little. That's just facing facts.Zebulon Dak":1qnorxte said:You guys are so negative.
Are you seriously saying that you believe we do not win the Superbowl without Percy Harvin last year?
No, I'm saying we won it with him so looking at it any other way is fruitless and negative.
hawk45":1z8wu3l3 said:Do you have difficulty distinguishing between correlation and causation?
hawk45":1z8wu3l3 said:If Percy being here did not *cause* us to win it, then we may well have won it anyhow yet retained pieces like Red, Clem, and Tate who in fact did *cause* us to win it. Looking at it that way is actually rational and productive in that the next time you are on the verge of such a trade you look back on this as a mistake and it informs future behavior.