Seahawk Sailor
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 22,963
- Reaction score
- 1
There is a bit of selective memory going on with a lot of Seahawks fans regarding Tate and Harvin. First, when we released Tate, no one would have made the argument that we should have released Harvin instead, so that point is moot. Second, even making such a comparison is mental revisionism. We can't just say, "gee, we shouldn't have let Tate go last spring because Harvin turned out to be a bad call this fall." Third, they're two different types of players, so it would never have come down to one or the other of those two anyway. Tate vs. Baldwin was the logical (and quite popular) discussion.