Sgt. Largent":3raqotmk said:
hawksfansinceday1":3raqotmk said:
Sgt. Largent":3raqotmk said:
..................Here's the cold hard facts on Willson
DAVIS HSU @DavisHsuSeattle 1h1 hour ago
Grey says TE Luke Willson has 15 targets and 4 catches last two weeks
Ouch. I knew it wasn't good but didn't know it was this poor. Hawks will drafting a TE by round 3 in May.
I really thought we'd bring in a TE free agent in the off season. I know we looked at quite a few, but holy moly are we thin with talent at TE. Willson might turn into a more dependable option, but as of now on a team that's competing we just don't have the time to wait for him to figure it out or not.
We all love Miller, but dude hasn't been able to stay healthy in years. Just can't count on him anymore.
And that's why Harvin is like herpes: The gift that just keeps on giving.
Signing Zach to a 2 year deal (an insulting offer at that, imo) you would have thought we would have looked to a very good TE that we easily could have had in last year's draft. But because of the strain known as Harvin, we had to go with Richardson, instead. I do understand the general consensus was "we need a BIG WR", but as it turns out, we weren't looking for that at all....there was one of those within reach as well.
You get the impression Bevell and Pete had made up their minds they wanted..A Harvin. Whether his name was Harvin or Richardson. It would be easy to believe that like a couple mad scientists, they worked feverishly on a playbook that included such a player. So with their minds finally made up that Harvin was toast, they refused to abandon that playbook, and decided to draft the player most resembling Percy Harvin.
I do think the Richardson pick will pay dividends, but with only so many balls to go around anyway, I'm unsure that pick shouldn't have been used elsewhere. Just my opinion, but it is impossible to really know how damaging the acquisition of Harvin was, and continues to be, to this franchise. As predicted.