HansGruber
New member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2012
- Messages
- 2,740
- Reaction score
- 0
Trrrroy":x33clgit said:Wartooth":x33clgit said:So 3 guys ahead of Russell don't have a ring...And somehow their better?
Key words in the headline is 'Former GM'.
The ring argument doesn't hold water. Marino doesn't have a ring, Flacco does.
Strawman and FAIL.
If you're trying to disprove the statement "Russell is better than the 3 QBs listed above him because he has won a Superbowl", then you need to directly counter that statement - not throw in some garbage cliche comparison of Flacco and Marino. Neither of those QBs are in the discussion.
Ultimately, when QBs are compared, rings DO matter. You may not personally agree with that, but that doesn't make it untrue. Marino is never argued as the GOAT because when it comes down to it, the ability to win Superbowls is ultimately what separates the great from the greatest. Nobody will ever argue Marino was greater than Montana because Montana beat him head-to-head in the Superbowl, and then went on to win 3 more (every time he was there). Peyton Manning is a better QB than Dan Marino because he has a ring while Marino doesn't.
You can argue about "it's a team game" all you want. It doesn't change anything. Ultimately, the job of a QB is to win championships. Period. Tom Brady and Joe Montana will always rank higher than Peyton Manning and Dan Marino because they are winners. History remembers winners.