JustTheTip":d9vbx9a4 said:You mean besides recover the touched blocked punt, right?
I guess. Still think he's stealing a spot.
JustTheTip":d9vbx9a4 said:You mean besides recover the touched blocked punt, right?
randomation":1nf22i1c said:Russ Willstrong":1nf22i1c said:He will make somebody's 53. He's the gamer/athlete profile that fits GB and Pats.
You don't give up a unicorn type player you cut Kearse and if need be Darboh and you keep both him and Kasen.
West TX Hawk":3btaxnj1 said:MontanaHawk05":3btaxnj1 said:West TX Hawk":3btaxnj1 said:Tanner's making this team and I find it strange many people have forgotten some of his contributions last year.
Easy to do when there's only two of them, only one of them involving being a wide receiver and that one happening courtesy of a busted coverage by a secondary so bad hell itself spat it back out.
Dude will make the roster because the 6th WR spot is one of the least important spots on it, but he's just a guy.
If a 6'6 230, 4.4 vetsatile special teams contributor is "just a guy" than I would like you to define what exactly you're looking for as a backup wr. No one said he's Julio, but he's proven he'll do whatever is asked of him and his RZ potential warrants a future with us.
JSeahawks":1wurns5i said:randomation":1wurns5i said:Russ Willstrong":1wurns5i said:He will make somebody's 53. He's the gamer/athlete profile that fits GB and Pats.
You don't give up a unicorn type player you cut Kearse and if need be Darboh and you keep both him and Kasen.
I think Darboh is going to come down with a convenient injury and be stashed on IR.
West TX Hawk":253fpzea said:Tanner's making this team and I find it strange many people have forgotten some of his contributions last year.
And the math isn't hard this year-keep 6: Baldwin, Lockett, Richardson, Kearse, Kasen, McEvoy. Darboh is IR'd. Moore and Lawler practice squad. That's it.
Hawks46":k6td19m5 said:McEvoy hasn't produced a whole lot, but he's also been the 6th WR on the squad. He caught 2 TD passes and averaged 15.6 yards per reception. He also had a nice long pass on a trick play.
He's also very good on ST and is one of the best blocking WR's on the team.
The thing about McEvoy is that when you watch him, he's just so smooth. He looks effortless out there, both running routes and catching passes. He gets great separation so you rarely even have to see his jumping ability, or him having to use his 6'6" frame. Add to this that he didn't even play WR in college. I only dug up QB and FS.
I will just say this: I think a guy that looks this smooth and comfortable, who finds open holes in the zone, who has this athletic profile and didn't even play full time WR in college has a much higher ceiling than Jermaine Kearse. if you held a gun to my head and made me choose, I'd go with McEvoy. We haven't seen his ceiling, but if you had to replace Kearse's production it wouldn't be hard.
Think of what McEvoy would do with Kearse's snaps. I think it would be more than Jermaine produces.