Hawkstorian
Well-known member
Or maybe he just thinks the Broncos will win. Lots of people do. I don't understand why we have to question his motives.
Hawkstorian":1ipzc0yn said:Or maybe he just thinks the Broncos will win. Lots of people do. I don't understand why we have to question his motives.
I saw a guy wearing one that said "If you can't beat 'em, sanction 'em" at SeaTac when I flew in from San Diego that era.MissoulaHawkFan":2syg8dmc said:......The era of the t-shirts that said Huskies, 11-0, if you can't beat'em, disqualify'em..............
plyka":15uze68s said:Just listening to the Podcast of First Take with Mark Brunell. If you remember, this is the same Brunell that picked the Saints twice, the 49ers (if memory serves) and claimed that the Clink was NOT the loudest stadium in the NFL (despite Guiness' claim that it is the loudest stadium in the world), and NOT the hardest place to get a win on the road.
Now you could just hear his glee, when he said: "Next week after Peyton walks in there and wins, he will be the best QB in history..." Next the hot chick asked him: "It's obvious you're leaning towards the Broncos, what's your prediction?" Brunell answers with a 32-17 easy victory for the Broncos.
Unlike most I don't think Seattle has a lot of haters in the media. There is an obvious bias in media people against Seattle, but it's more due to them not caring enough to research/watch the games rather than a bias against. Skip Bayless has a bias against. But that's really the only person I know or think that has a bias against Seattle, except for Brunell.
Anyone know what this guy has against the Seahawks? I feel like he absolutely hates them / disrespects them whenever he gets a chance.
hawk79":uy7xodlf said:Here's what I love with these guys. Broncos, at home, during the playoffs, they won both games by an average score of 25 points. AT HOME. Yet, Brunell predicts a score of 32-17. So by that logic, San Diego's and New England's defense is much better than ours. Really? Really?
Pretty sure 05 was Jason Campbell and 06 was Todd Collins.stmcmurray":3fft6opo said:Also, if memory serves me correctly, Brunell was QB of the Redskins when we beat them here in 05/06 in the Divisional round.
stmcmurray":1o7aaruw said:Also, if memory serves me correctly, Brunell was QB of the Redskins when we beat them here in 05/06 in the Divisional round.
Hawkstorian":3a9ov2sm said:But it makes us look stupid as collective fans if we continually get upset when anyone picks against us, even if they do it over and over again. Like Merrill Hoge. Who cares? What does it have to do with anything?
Vetamur":13v1hmk9 said:Didnt Brunell go to UW? Havent heard about his bias.
I think Marshall Faulk has the most obvious bias of anyone Ive watched or read much from.
ChrisB Bacon":1bxkuy2o said:Pretty sure 05 was Jason Campbell and 06 was Todd Collins.stmcmurray":1bxkuy2o said:Also, if memory serves me correctly, Brunell was QB of the Redskins when we beat them here in 05/06 in the Divisional round.
No, it was Brunell who played against us in '05. Todd Collins faced us two years later in the playoffs.ChrisB Bacon":pa9zvbob said:Pretty sure 05 was Jason Campbell and 06 was Todd Collins.stmcmurray":pa9zvbob said:Also, if memory serves me correctly, Brunell was QB of the Redskins when we beat them here in 05/06 in the Divisional round.