Hasselbeck":2196cl0f said:
HawkWow":2196cl0f said:
Easily amused I take it. Since you've chosen to get involved, perhaps you'd like to answer this question I posed to Throw.
I look forward to hearing your explanation on why the Vikes put Harvin on IR in week 10 during a play off run for a sprained ankle that required no more than 2-3 weeks to heal.
It probably had nothing to do with his blow up with Frazier on national TV (perhaps compromising his trade value) right? Let me guess...they were being extra cautious and saving him for the following year's superbowl run.
Which one of the above scenarios is more likely?
Who the hell cares? What does this have to do with 2013 where he's no longer a Viking?
I think it's pretty safe to assume Percy wanted out of Minnesota. He didn't like Frazier. He hated Ponder. The Vikings realized this and determined shutting him down for the year was better for the team.
.
Either you are unaware, or just omitting Urban Meyer (who covered for Harvin's pot usage), Gonzales (who Harvin grabbed by the throat and threw to the ground) and Childress (who Harvin attacked with a weight) from your list of coaches Harvin "didn't like" to bolster your argument.
Me? I see a pattern here that's too obvious to ignore. He "hated Ponder"? I'll ask the same question you did..."who the hell cares"? Harvin's job is to STFU and do what he's paid to do, not question his coaches, threaten to hold out, or hand pick the QB (or WRs) that will make him the most money.
IF Harvin is not disruptive, catches some TDs and contributes to our success, I won't say I was wrong about him (I'm not) but I will admit he has apparently made change. And that is something we all better hope for...change.
When Tate voiced his displeasure about the Harvin signing, it was easy to dismiss Tate as "selfish". I find that incredibly ironic.