TwistedHusky":uzdrsha2 said:Yawn.
In a draft that has some of the best secondary depth in close to 5 years, after enduring holes in the secondary repeatedly....we draft a DL in a draft where DL talent is below average.
Yay.
The problem with "having lots of draft capital" is that you still have to invest it wisely.
Our first pick is a guy who half-asses it repeatedly in games. And isn't as good as DL historically have been at that slot. But hey, we traded around alot and got someone mediocre.
Maybe we can pick up a backup punter with some amazing draft day moves, racking us up some great picks so we can squander them on average players?
nash72":1bs8poay said:TwistedHusky":1bs8poay said:Yawn.
In a draft that has some of the best secondary depth in close to 5 years, after enduring holes in the secondary repeatedly....we draft a DL in a draft where DL talent is below average.
Yay.
The problem with "having lots of draft capital" is that you still have to invest it wisely.
Our first pick is a guy who half-asses it repeatedly in games. And isn't as good as DL historically have been at that slot. But hey, we traded around alot and got someone mediocre.
Maybe we can pick up a backup punter with some amazing draft day moves, racking us up some great picks so we can squander them on average players?
He almost had 2 sacks last season. I'm sure he's the answer for our inside pass rush.
SOURCES TELL US "He has a chance to be a dominant player in our league. I mean dominant. It hasn't turned on for him all the way yet but if it does, he could be like Mario Williams. He's just a little lazy and I worry about whether he is going to be a self-starter." -- NFC North area scout
nash72":253nb20z said:TwistedHusky":253nb20z said:Yawn.
In a draft that has some of the best secondary depth in close to 5 years, after enduring holes in the secondary repeatedly....we draft a DL in a draft where DL talent is below average.
Yay.
The problem with "having lots of draft capital" is that you still have to invest it wisely.
Our first pick is a guy who half-asses it repeatedly in games. And isn't as good as DL historically have been at that slot. But hey, we traded around alot and got someone mediocre.
Maybe we can pick up a backup punter with some amazing draft day moves, racking us up some great picks so we can squander them on average players?
He almost had 2 sacks last season. I'm sure he's the answer for our inside pass rush.
HawkFan72":3w21deo3 said:It's pretty clear the Hawks don't like any of the top O-linemen in this draft.
ivotuk":3l10h8k6 said:Link from Rob's site seahawksdraftblog
[youtube]Cy7erbPJISQ[/youtube]
Northwest Seahawk":2lnok0dc said:The D-line has never fully recovered from the loss of Red Bryant and Brandon Mebane . Great pick.
jdemps":2atzwge9 said:ivotuk":2atzwge9 said:Link from Rob's site seahawksdraftblog
[youtube]Cy7erbPJISQ[/youtube]
I was just about to post this. Elite talent who quit on a bad team. Anyone think he'll quit while lined up with Clark, Bennett and Avril.
I'm just wondering what position he'll play. 1 or 3 tech on passing downs? 5 tech on run downs. Maybe reed will switch to 1 tech?
Give this guy a couple of weeks in Hawaii with Mike B and shit will get real.
Really happy with this pick. We had ZERO inside pass rush last year especially with Mike B's injury.
TwistedHusky":3othr37c said:I don't think you need to be an NFL scout to know that guys with poor work ethics generally don't work out well.
That said, his film looks pretty average to me and Michigan ran through a string of pretty weak to average teams. It wasn't exactly a murderer's row on the schedule.
Not impressed and not sure I am expecting much but hey, happy to be proven wrong.
But 2 sacks for a DL is sh*t, QB pressures or no. And considering the quality of his competition? Even worse.
TwistedHusky":3jhg5oh3 said:But 2 sacks for a DL is sh*t, QB pressures or no. And considering the quality of his competition? Even worse.
Yep. If the rose-colored glasses(for Pac-10)would come off, they would see that. He was nursing a serious ankle injury last season. Hence his iffy stats. I follow the enemy(MSU) big time out here.Rat":mufs6tvi said:NJlargent":mufs6tvi said:You really have to work at justifying this pick. Oh well makes for entertaining reading
He's an elite talent. Doesn't need more justification than that.
I think JS has a boner for Big 10 talent lately. loljdemps":25l2kdl5 said:TwistedHusky":25l2kdl5 said:But 2 sacks for a DL is sh*t, QB pressures or no. And considering the quality of his competition? Even worse.
2 Sacks against double and triple teams because no one else on your line belongs in the FBS.
The real issue is that McDowell doesn't have more than 2 pass rush moves and no countermove. He's begging for some coaching. You know who else came into the league with a limited arsenal and took off after some coaching. Frank Clark.
:2thumbs: Somebody did their homework here.hawknation2017":euffg69y said:TwistedHusky":euffg69y said:I don't think you need to be an NFL scout to know that guys with poor work ethics generally don't work out well.
That said, his film looks pretty average to me and Michigan ran through a string of pretty weak to average teams. It wasn't exactly a murderer's row on the schedule.
Not impressed and not sure I am expecting much but hey, happy to be proven wrong.
But 2 sacks for a DL is sh*t, QB pressures or no. And considering the quality of his competition? Even worse.
Big Ten has some consistently strong offensive lines, especially in comparison to the lack of athleticism of the Pac-12/Big 12 and lack of technique of the SEC/ACC. He was on a bad team and dealt with a few injuries last year.