brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
If we are going to stick with Okung then the FO must account for the fact that he will miss some time.
I find that hard to agree with considering 4 out of the 5 starting OL were drafted in the first 2 rounds all since 2010Barthawk":3nbbgqhq said:I get the feeling that this team doesn't feel that they need top flight OL in order to succeed. I thought this when we didn't go after any mid-level FAs the past two offseasons. I think OL will constantly be a source of ire for us in the passing game, but having an extremely mobile QB does make one want to spend $$$ elsewhere.
seahawks3732":2h3sf8wq said:I find that hard to agree with considering 4 out of the 5 starting OL were drafted in the first 2 rounds all since 2010Barthawk":2h3sf8wq said:I get the feeling that this team doesn't feel that they need top flight OL in order to succeed. I thought this when we didn't go after any mid-level FAs the past two offseasons. I think OL will constantly be a source of ire for us in the passing game, but having an extremely mobile QB does make one want to spend $$$ elsewhere.
bigskydoc":kh8yzcnq said:The coup of finding an immediate replacement for Okung in this draft would be bigger than the Odell Beckhan Jr find last year, especially with the 31st pick. Pretty close to the coup of drafting Wilson in the third round.
I'm not convinced there is a free agent better than Okung, and I am certain that there won't be a cheaper one that is on par with him. Extend him now while you can use his injury history against him. Load it with games played/ injury clauses. If he has an injury free, high-production year, his price tag will skyrocket.
-bsd RPA