It's bad enough when they do it once (slow news day, whatever) , but when it becomes a daily thing, where they double and triple down on their own stupidity because they want it to happen SO badly, it shows what no talent radio hacks they really are.Grahamhawker":1az2z2sh said:Sports Hernia":1az2z2sh said:Looks like the RS haters on sportsradio had a giant swing and a miss on this one. :lol:
Said from day one, they made a huge mountain out of mole hill- just to have something interesting as a topic for a change.
MontanaHawk05":3urv3dkq said:Sherman is worth 1 win a season. I'm quite happy to keep him.
Seymour":1ytcfwz3 said:MontanaHawk05":1ytcfwz3 said:Sherman is worth 1 win a season. I'm quite happy to keep him.
Do you have a link to prove this? :twisted:
Uncle Si":3u52g588 said:Seymour":3u52g588 said:MontanaHawk05":3u52g588 said:Sherman is worth 1 win a season. I'm quite happy to keep him.
Do you have a link to prove this? :twisted:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0259/2151/files/rs25-hero-tip.jpg?31975
StoneCold":1xts838u said:I have a hard time believing they were ever serious about trading Sherman. There is no way you get enough value for him to still have a competitive DB group next year. Shead is hurt, remove Sherman and now you have either untested draft picks from the last few years, rookies or free agents starting to open the season. Doesn't make sense to risk sacrificing next year to move Richard now. Draft a couple of CB's, get them some experience and then it makes some sense to trade Richard.
Sgt. Largent":1i73owyj said:StoneCold":1i73owyj said:I have a hard time believing they were ever serious about trading Sherman. There is no way you get enough value for him to still have a competitive DB group next year. Shead is hurt, remove Sherman and now you have either untested draft picks from the last few years, rookies or free agents starting to open the season. Doesn't make sense to risk sacrificing next year to move Richard now. Draft a couple of CB's, get them some experience and then it makes some sense to trade Richard.
If it doesn't happen, we'll never know how serious it was.
If I had to put a percentage on it, this whole exercise was 50% trying to accommodate Richard if he indeed was the one who initiated the trade request..............and 50% sending him a message that;
1. You're not above being traded if you continue to be a pain in the ass.
2. Your value isn't as high as you think it is, thus no teams offering the moon for you.
StoneCold":1cmesa2e said:When I think about it from the Teams perspective they are looking at next year and the year after with the mantra "always compete", I just don't see how they do that by trading Richard this year. There's no way they get enough value.