Sign37now
Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2010
- Messages
- 706
- Reaction score
- 0
It would have been an embarrassing blood bath..
We could have beat Green Bay at our House next week
- Thread starter MO Hawk
- Start date
seahawksny
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 5
Sox-n-Hawks":bcsuqfxj said:
Not sure if it gets that far. I think Atlanta has real shot
Man, now I feel even worse and think even more we could have beat Green Bay at our house.
GB had lot's of illness this week, many injuries and we were due for a break out game. Just
goes to show we have to win at every opportunity because one doesn't know what opportunities
lie ahead.
Falcons are good, we were better, we just played last week like GB is playing today ie. dropping passes, missed blocks, missed tackles etc. Those aren't your opponent out playing you, those are mental errors.
Guess it doesn't matter though. long off season ahead.
GB had lot's of illness this week, many injuries and we were due for a break out game. Just
goes to show we have to win at every opportunity because one doesn't know what opportunities
lie ahead.
Falcons are good, we were better, we just played last week like GB is playing today ie. dropping passes, missed blocks, missed tackles etc. Those aren't your opponent out playing you, those are mental errors.
Guess it doesn't matter though. long off season ahead.
ludakrishna
Active member
We don't have the D-Coordinator capable of planning a good game to beat GB. We are 0-2 under Richard. Rodgers would've picked us apart and Russell would've been his terrible playoff self.
chris98251
Well-known member
MO Hawk":1m9x7hw3 said:
History says different, Atlanta beat us straight up, sure we had injuries, but the way we played against them we did not appear to be a better team that day.
Scorpion05
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,722
- Reaction score
- 10
I disagree with some of the points here. We could have taken Green Bay. We lack so much faith in a team that has repeatedly been contenders. In fact, we put up a MUCH better fight against Atlanta than Green Bay did, and could have won that game if not for that botched punt and safety.
With our loss, I feel like we made key mistakes. With Green Bay's loss, I felt like they got their asses kicked from beginning to end. We were somewhat competitive :snack:
We're a top team in the NFL. Aside from the Patriots, and maybe the Falcons this year, what team can be said to be far and away better? We were Super Bowl contenders this year and we're gonna be next year. We have a great QB(who played better than Rodgers against the same team) and a solid defense. I do miss Quinn though, he's clearly the Super Bowl difference and a key reason for our success on defense. Richards needs to go
Especially in our house, I sincerely believe we could have beaten the Pack
With our loss, I feel like we made key mistakes. With Green Bay's loss, I felt like they got their asses kicked from beginning to end. We were somewhat competitive :snack:
We're a top team in the NFL. Aside from the Patriots, and maybe the Falcons this year, what team can be said to be far and away better? We were Super Bowl contenders this year and we're gonna be next year. We have a great QB(who played better than Rodgers against the same team) and a solid defense. I do miss Quinn though, he's clearly the Super Bowl difference and a key reason for our success on defense. Richards needs to go
Especially in our house, I sincerely believe we could have beaten the Pack
Cyrus12
Well-known member
would have been close but any argument is really senseless since it didn't happen. At least we get the higher draft pick...but then again GB has a second round pick which we will not have....
seahawksny
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,611
- Reaction score
- 5
Scorpion05":tn7y5rtk said:
If it really came down to two plays, then our game would have been closer. Both the pack and seattle got Butts handed to them.
Scorpion05
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,722
- Reaction score
- 10
seahawksny":1ljmn97x said:
I personally believe in momentum changing plays. That was a possible 10 point swing, if not more. I personally think the game goes on differently at that point and ends up much closer. Big difference being ahead by 10 points at halftime than being down 9 or more points at half time
sdog1981
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 3,367
- Reaction score
- 240
Dom Capers owns Wilson and Bevell. Without the come from behind win in the NFC Championship game, the Seahawks would have lost the last three games they have played aginst the Packers. Wilson has thrown 10 interceptions over the last 3 games against Capers. So no the Packers beat the Seahawks and Wilson would have thrown 3 picks.
evergreen
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 1,239
- Reaction score
- 454
Same thing happened in 2010. Like 2010 we could've played GB.
Siouxhawk
New member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2015
- Messages
- 3,776
- Reaction score
- 0
We have a pretty decent track record of owning the Packers in the playoffs.
FlyingGreg
Active member
Siouxhawk":27mtm1n8 said:
"Owning"? We beat them once, on a miracle.
They have beat us twice in the playoffs previously.
Largent80
New member
Even Macaque knows we would have beat them.
FlyingGreg":4g52ffuc said:
Yup. Posted it in another thread as well, but historically Wilson hasn't had even one good game against the Packers.
You can't look at the ATL game and think we would've beat GB. It doesnt' work that way. It's a different team with different players.
Might as well say: "well, if we had ATL's OL and Julio Jones to go with Baldwin and Graham, we'd be in the SB !"
FlyingGreg
Active member
Hawks46":289n2pfv said:
He played well in the 2014 season opener against them (36-16 win on TNF). 19-28, 191 yds, 2 TDs, 0 INTs; 29 yds rushing.
But, other than that...Dom Capers has made Wilson his b*tch.
SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Nope, WOULD have.
FlyingGreg":1p7l7qhi said:
That's what I was gonna say. I hope he was being sarcastic because our Hawks ONE win was at home and required just that...a miracle.
And to answer the OP...GB would have come into the Clink and STOMPED our Hawks even with their injury depleted team. But then again...playing Packers at home would have required the Hawks to BEAT Atlanta...and had they beat Atlanta they would have had to look a lot different on the field than what we saw. Had they tore up Atl for the win we'd probably be all singing a different tune. But they did not...
SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Wrong, Hawks would have beaten the packers. Especially as beat up as they were.
