Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
RRPP = Paradigm Peteball. ukeface:
AubHawk71":22t7mc1p said:One series, previous to a punt, in the 2nd half:
Run Marshawn up the middle: Gain of 1
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Punt.
Inspired!
AubHawk71":3vy25uha said:One series, previous to a punt, in the 2nd half:
Run Marshawn up the middle: Gain of 1
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Punt.
Inspired!
Well said! :2thumbs:Sgt. Largent":32kpgkox said:No Pete will never adjust, because he has a 30 year track record of his schemes and philosophies working, to the tune of SB trophies and college championships.
We're seeing his defensive scheme working in SF with Sallah, and we're seeing his offensive scheme working in Tennessee with Vrabel and pounding the rock opening up the passing game.
So while I'd love to see some minor tweaks to what Pete does, especially allowing Russell to go up tempo more when the offense is sputtering, I get why he wants to minimize possessions for the other team with physical ball control on offense and a fast aggressive defense.
So change? Nope, but if Pete DOES want to scheme as he does, he better significantly upgrade his defense. Because his schemes don't work without a top 10 defense.
I'm not the smartest guy on the whole site. Since you don't understand the topic of this thread, I feel comfortable saying I'm smarter than you, though.Flyingsquad23":1t3fc2bu said:So tell me Roland since you’re the smartest guy on this whole site, if the Hawks score 30 in the first half and lose on a last second FG does the L feel different, do they get to play on because they scored a bunch in the first half.
The only and I mean the only score that ever matters is the game winning score. Which in this case came on the Packers first possession of the 3rd qtr. at 4:54 of the 4th the Hawks had the ball with a chance to win, how they got there was irrelevant at that moment. I would also add that because of good clock management the Hawks had a chance at 2:19 & 2:00 for the D to stop the Pack on 3rd down to have yet another chance to make all the plays that came before irrelevant.
NFSeahawks628":2ziznb76 said:Pete limits the team I don’t care what his track record says. Wilson always saves his bacon because Wilson is elite. The two halves were night and day, its obnoxious football and as much as you all want to believe its a recipe for success its really not.
He’s stubborn because he’s won championships this way so thats all he knows but he’s missed a TON in the draft so it makes this strategy impossible.
And Yes, I do believe Russell is being wasted, draft/develop a competent o-line around him. Jesus, look at Mahomes.
Actually it didnt happen like that. Lynch got 8 ,then 1 and we had 3rd and 1. Not that big of a deal. We didnt move it passing much either.AubHawk71":131ol42n said:One series, previous to a punt, in the 2nd half:
Run Marshawn up the middle: Gain of 1
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Punt.
Inspired!
AubHawk71":1j7du0gk said:One series, previous to a punt, in the 2nd half:
Run Marshawn up the middle: Gain of 1
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Run Marshawn up the middle: No gain
Punt.
Inspired!
USA Today JUST LIKE YOU have it wrong.....Neither you nor them got Paul Allen & the Seahawks fans their FIRST LOMBARDI...PETE DID!!!!!!!!RolandDeschain":378w561t said:I'm not the smartest guy on the whole site. Since you don't understand the topic of this thread, I feel comfortable saying I'm smarter than you, though.Flyingsquad23":378w561t said:So tell me Roland since you’re the smartest guy on this whole site, if the Hawks score 30 in the first half and lose on a last second FG does the L feel different, do they get to play on because they scored a bunch in the first half.
The only and I mean the only score that ever matters is the game winning score. Which in this case came on the Packers first possession of the 3rd qtr. at 4:54 of the 4th the Hawks had the ball with a chance to win, how they got there was irrelevant at that moment. I would also add that because of good clock management the Hawks had a chance at 2:19 & 2:00 for the D to stop the Pack on 3rd down to have yet another chance to make all the plays that came before irrelevant.
Here's USA Today calling out Carroll for the same crap being discussed in this thread, by the way: https://ftw.usatoday.com/2020/01/pete-c ... ks-packers