NFSeahawks
New member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 4,714
- Reaction score
- 0
He was open on the last play of the game in the end zone.
Silly to throw to Kearse there.
Silly to throw to Kearse there.
Why are we not using Graham?
- Thread starter NFSeahawks
- Start date
hawk45
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2009
- Messages
- 10,009
- Reaction score
- 16
Because chess match
NFSeahawks
New member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 4,714
- Reaction score
- 0
Yea, hows that working out? lool
potatohead
New member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2013
- Messages
- 153
- Reaction score
- 0
On that last play nobody, NOBODY, wants to catch a TD pass more than Graham. His old team and a chance to steal the game in their house. Unless there were four guys on him it is a freaking crime not to throw the ball his way.
Flyingsquad23
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2016
- Messages
- 1,386
- Reaction score
- 587
Just watched the play again and looked to me like he was double covered, the under guy only came off when Russ threw he other way. The fade is not my favorite play but it was there if Russ doesn't hitch before the throw.
mistaowen
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 6,335
- Reaction score
- 612
In four years we will be in the same situation and bevell will get a huge smirk as he dials up the pass to graham instead. This is all about future game planning
MarylandHawk
New member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 0
I guess it was just an accident that this guy was probably the #1 endzone target in the NFL for four years straight. At least we have him blocking good.
NFSeahawks
New member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 4,714
- Reaction score
- 0
Flyingsquad23":58yutw0y said:
He was double covered AND OPEN.
High odds > Low odds.
Silver Hawk
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2015
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 3
Looked to me like the fade was going to be thrown, no matter what. Russ was cranking it up as soon as the ball was snapped.
Not getting 3 plays off there was ridiculously bad. Not getting at least a couple of targets to JG was criminal.
Just a horrid game. Sure didn't help that the defense was likely gassed from last week still. Then, no Kam. No Bennett.
Not getting 3 plays off there was ridiculously bad. Not getting at least a couple of targets to JG was criminal.
Just a horrid game. Sure didn't help that the defense was likely gassed from last week still. Then, no Kam. No Bennett.
CodeWarrior
New member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,769
- Reaction score
- 0
Graham and Russell just don't have the rapport yet. Graham should be a safety blanket and he isn't. If you want to see productive comfort go watch Rodgers throw to Jordy.
NFSeahawks
New member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 4,714
- Reaction score
- 0
Silver Hawk":2aodtckb said:
Which is why it doesn't make sense why just throw a fade when there are better options with other targets?
Seems dumb.
brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
Lob to Graham in the endzone should have been practiced so much now that Russ could throw it
In his sleep. Even if Bevel/Pete didn't call for it Russell still made a poor choice throwing to Kerase instead.
In his sleep. Even if Bevel/Pete didn't call for it Russell still made a poor choice throwing to Kerase instead.
