MO Hawk":3a3ersew said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
pittpnthrs":iqv8g7q2 said:MO Hawk":iqv8g7q2 said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
They werent dumb enough to call a slant though.
Apples and Oranges. Their OC wasnt an assclown that called a slant into a stacked and crowded box.MO Hawk":1fyfjsiz said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
pittpnthrs":zs2sjeau said:MO Hawk":zs2sjeau said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
They werent dumb enough to call a slant though.
WilsonMVP":3s30ilb6 said:pittpnthrs":3s30ilb6 said:MO Hawk":3s30ilb6 said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
They werent dumb enough to call a slant though.
Ya they only had their backup TE throw into the endzone to their QB. A truly sound and smart play lol
Seahawkville":i0egm72y said:Should have run it...... :sarcasm_off:
You’re kidding right? The Super Bowl Losing Interception was from a formation where tons of Seahawk film had them running that pattern combination, while not one time in team history has Philadelphia come out in a pistol bunch, motioned their QB to a wingback position, direct snapped to the RB, reversed to the TE and threw to the QB/WB into the flat.WilsonMVP":ucpsj2v1 said:pittpnthrs":ucpsj2v1 said:MO Hawk":ucpsj2v1 said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
They werent dumb enough to call a slant though.
Ya they only had their backup TE throw into the endzone to their QB. A truly sound and smart play lol
253hawk":grx781ko said:And Nick Foles called the play during the timeout, not the OC or Pederson.
https://streamable.com/zr4pv
Marvin49":1yr59i6p said:Couple things....
1) They don't have Marshawn in the backfield.
2) Not only did they throw it, they ran like a 3 in one trick play (Direct Snap to RB/End Around/TE pass to QB)
I was not a fan of Doug Peterson, but calling that play in that circumstance was Balsy.
Bingo, this guy gets it! ^^^5_Golden_Rings":2fkukxph said:You’re kidding right? The Super Bowl Losing Interception was from a formation where tons of Seahawk film had them running that pattern combination, while not one time in team history has Philadelphia come out in a pistol bunch, motioned their QB to a wingback position, direct snapped to the RB, reversed to the TE and threw to the QB/WB into the flat.WilsonMVP":2fkukxph said:pittpnthrs":2fkukxph said:MO Hawk":2fkukxph said:Anybody find it ironic that Philly threw the ball on the Patriots on the goal line and it worked? Dang!
Probably happened because Malcom Butler wasn't in the game.
Maybe the difference was execution by the players.
They werent dumb enough to call a slant though.
Ya they only had their backup TE throw into the endzone to their QB. A truly sound and smart play lol
Comparing those two calls is absurd.