Marquise Blaire

bbsplitter

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
681
Reaction score
23
Does anyone know why he has not gotten the chance to start at free instead of strong safety? Do they view him as too slow? Is it not a natural position for him? I feel like Blair at FS and McDougald at SS would be the best combination of personnel we have to put on the field at the same time. I love Thompson for his crazy game changing interceptions he has had lately, but it's time to move on. He has made the same coverage mistakes ever since he has been here. I am all for giving chances and letting the players grow over the years, but I think Thompson is the type of player who will be released or not re-signed at some point and then never heard from again in the league. There is no reason to start that type of player and not move on to at least someone with potential.
 
D

DomeHawk

Guest
bbsplitter":1krfmkpo said:
Does anyone know why he has not gotten the chance to start at free instead of strong safety? Do they view him as too slow? Is it not a natural position for him? I feel like Blair at FS and McDougald at SS would be the best combination of personnel we have to put on the field at the same time. I love Thompson for his crazy game changing interceptions he has had lately, but it's time to move on. He has made the same coverage mistakes ever since he has been here. I am all for giving chances and letting the players grow over the years, but I think Thompson is the type of player who will be released or not re-signed at some point and then never heard from again in the league. There is no reason to start that type of player and not move on to at least someone with potential.

I think they like his aggressiveness but your observation does seem reasonable.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,616
I think Blair's more natural position is at SS.

I mean, hasn't Pete said the reason we drafted him is because he can be that aggressive hitter we need at SS? McDougald can play both, but as of now if we're developing Blair for one of the two safety positions, he's better suited for SS.

IMO he's not fast enough either to play Pete's cover 3 one high type safety scheme. I think his 40 time was 4.5?
 
OP
OP
bbsplitter

bbsplitter

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
681
Reaction score
23
Sgt. Largent":jpl97wxv said:
I think Blair's more natural position is at SS.

I mean, hasn't Pete said the reason we drafted him is because he can be that aggressive hitter we need at SS? McDougald can play both, but as of now if we're developing Blair for one of the two safety positions, he's better suited for SS.

IMO he's not fast enough either to play Pete's cover 3 one high type safety scheme. I think his 40 time was 4.5?

I think Pete just said for his aggressiveness, I don't think he ever mentioned a specific position but your probably right that was the intent. Realistically though we have been playing a lot more a cover 2 ever since Earl left than we ever have. I just feel like Blair has shown way more coverage talent and deserved to be on the field somehow over Thompson.
 

AgentDib

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
5,474
Reaction score
1,255
Location
Bothell
bbsplitter":2s8uss4l said:
I just feel like Blair has shown way more coverage talent and deserved to be on the field somehow over Thompson.
Are you talking about previous games? In this game both McDougald and Hill were injured so we needed to have Thompson (FS) and Blair (SS) on the field together.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,616
bbsplitter":3p110pwv said:
Sgt. Largent":3p110pwv said:
I think Blair's more natural position is at SS.

I mean, hasn't Pete said the reason we drafted him is because he can be that aggressive hitter we need at SS? McDougald can play both, but as of now if we're developing Blair for one of the two safety positions, he's better suited for SS.

IMO he's not fast enough either to play Pete's cover 3 one high type safety scheme. I think his 40 time was 4.5?

I think Pete just said for his aggressiveness, I don't think he ever mentioned a specific position but your probably right that was the intent. Realistically though we have been playing a lot more a cover 2 ever since Earl left than we ever have. I just feel like Blair has shown way more coverage talent and deserved to be on the field somehow over Thompson.

1. It's not hard to look better than both Thompson and Hill.

2. We haven't seen enough of Blair to know how good he is yet, or where he fits in. I was merely puking up what Pete's said about him as to why we drafted him. Pete and John wanted some physicality and toughness at the safety position........and I do think Blair provides that, and will provide that going forward.

IMO priority #1 next off season is to find or draft a free safety. Our safety play this year has been one of the big Achilles Heels of our defense, along with the pass rush. Both Thompson and Hill, and frankly McDougald just aren't the answer. Not dynamic enough.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
AgentDib":7rbxf8w5 said:
bbsplitter":7rbxf8w5 said:
I just feel like Blair has shown way more coverage talent and deserved to be on the field somehow over Thompson.
Are you talking about previous games? In this game both McDougald and Hill were injured so we needed to have Thompson (FS) and Blair (SS) on the field together.

This.

Blair has actually been practicing exclusively at FS, but need forced the move to SS this week.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,335
Reaction score
1,721
[tweet]https://twitter.com/A_Jude/status/1186404126067834880[/tweet]
 

WestcoastSteve

Active member
Joined
Aug 1, 2009
Messages
2,719
Reaction score
0
Blair can play either. I think he's needed in the box though. McDougald has been bad against the run, Hill can't stay healthy.

Whatever gets Tedric off the field I'm for. His interceptions were deflections not elite breaks on the ball, I'm thankful but not impressed.
 

Mad Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
2,493
Reaction score
637
Blair is a SS in a FS's body. That's a bit of an issue for health moving forward. If you are a big hitter but don't have the frame for it, you aren't likely to stay on the field.

That being said, he deserves to start opposite McDougald and put out two FS/SS hybrids.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,412
Reaction score
5,448
Location
Kent, WA
Probably just lost track of him because his name was spelled wrong on the team roster.

:twisted:
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,616
Mad Dog":12a6cj5v said:
Blair is a SS in a FS's body. That's a bit of an issue for health moving forward. If you are a big hitter but don't have the frame for it, you aren't likely to stay on the field.

That being said, he deserves to start opposite McDougald and put out two FS/SS hybrids.

Blair's a little undersized for SS, but with how the league is trending towards no one can hit anymore anyway, he's plenty big to be a good SS. Dude can hit, and is aggressive.

So I'm not worried about his size. The days of a Kam stealing player's souls with gigantic bone jarring hits is over.
 

Boiler

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
422
Reaction score
13
Location
Centennial, CO
sutz":2cn6kzu1 said:
Probably just lost track of him because his name was spelled wrong on the team roster.

:twisted:

That's not it. It's the extra "e" weighing him down.
 

xray

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
9,562
Reaction score
1,629
Location
AZ
I really like Blaire,,,but Flowers is getting more aggressive too...maybe a new nasty secondary starting to jell . :D
 

justafan

Active member
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
2,102
Reaction score
3
He is faster than TT, God knows he has to be smarter. I think he has all the physical tools to play FS his aggressiveness could play against him if he doesnt reign in it a little.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,023
Reaction score
1,718
Location
Sammamish, WA
justafan":3r3g1sct said:
He is faster than TT, God knows he has to be smarter. I think he has all the physical tools to play FS his aggressiveness could play against him if he doesnt reign in it a little.

There are quite a bit of DL's faster than TT. If you are comparing speed with TT for DBs, the bar is too low.
 

justafan

Active member
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
2,102
Reaction score
3
hawkfan68":1o04zvmx said:
justafan":1o04zvmx said:
He is faster than TT, God knows he has to be smarter. I think he has all the physical tools to play FS his aggressiveness could play against him if he doesnt reign in it a little.

There are quite a bit of DL's faster than TT. If you are comparing speed with TT for DBs, the bar is too low.

There was a question in an earlier post about his speed to play FS
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,138
Reaction score
1,076
Location
Taipei
He is way faster than TT and McDougald.

4.48 is plenty fast for a Safety
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,412
Reaction score
5,448
Location
Kent, WA
Smellyman":1olzm3rr said:
He is way faster than TT and McDougald.

4.48 is plenty fast for a Safety
When? 15 years ago? Maybe in a Cover 2 scheme. In our Single High cover 3 I think we need more. In the time someone like TT makes it to the numbers, ET was at the sideline.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,718
Reaction score
1,750
Location
Roy Wa.
sutz":37kolnmm said:
Smellyman":37kolnmm said:
He is way faster than TT and McDougald.

4.48 is plenty fast for a Safety
When? 15 years ago? Maybe in a Cover 2 scheme. In our Single High cover 3 I think we need more. In the time someone like TT makes it to the numbers, ET was at the sideline.


4.34 Guys and safeties are not exactly a commodity, teams were calling him to small initially but agreed that his speed was exceptional.
 

Latest posts

Top