SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
My god, are you that attention starved?
Rich, coming from one of the biggest offenders.SoulfishHawk":1di9u81l said:My god, are you that attention starved?
Throwdown":2dhnuav4 said:3 OC’s, same issues, only constant is the QB.
It’s been back for nearly a year now going back to last season. Russ either can’t or simply won’t evolve his game to attack how they’re playing him and he needs to leave.
23. SEATTLE SEAHAWKS (Down 5)
Best-graded: T Duane Brown | 70.3
Worst-graded: C Kyle Fuller | 51.3
Seattle’s line never looked good with Russell Wilson at quarterback, but with him now out, it's clear how much he helped the unit despite holding onto the ball. With Geno Smith at quarterback, the group’s weaknesses are on obvious display, and five different linemen have surrendered at least 10 total pressures this season. Perhaps most concerning for the Seahawks is that Duane Brown may be finally slowing down. He's earned a 70.3 overall PFF grade, the lowest mark since his rookie season as he plays his age-36 season
Tical21":36rf32rq said:We're sorry Tical. You were right, Tical.
It's not like I'm not rooting for Russell. I just think paying him (twice) was a huge mistake. We've gotten progressively worse and worse since he got paid.
Dude can't execute basic concepts against basic defenses. He just can't. He never has. He always had the legs as his equalizer. It didn't matter if he couldn't execute against cover-2, because he could always just extend the play until someone got open. And y'all were like "look at his passer rating against zone". Ignorant. Now he can't. So we're in the situation I told you all for years was coming. We have a QB that can no longer rely on his legs, and his success now is determined by how well he can anticipate and execute from the pocket. Unfortunately, that part of his game just never developed. Luckily, he still has some trade value, but it is diminishing rapidly.
At least answer me this ... I've told you for years that he can't execute basic concepts against zone defenses. Do you believe me now?
SoulfishHawk":1p1eidiq said:So you're gonna' just ignore the FACT that Russ has saved Pete's a** for years by pulling out wins in the 4th quarter and OT? You think they actually went 12-4 last year because of Pete? No, they didn't at all.
SoulfishHawk":178yyyiu said:All a matter of opinion. And that's fine.
Tical21":22vxhkn0 said:Simply a lazy take......
Tical21":2kofaxjz said:Took a lot of crap from a lot of people on here for a lotta years. Bit my lip knowing eventually everything I've been saying for years would be apparent to everyone. DO YOU HEAR ME NOW!!>!>!>
#3 never mastered the mental part of playing quarterback, which was always going to be needed when his legs couldn't create magic anymore. Now his ego prevents us from running, which ironically is the one thing that would help him most.
We've been seeing 2-deep almost exclusively for a year now. And have we executed even simple cover-2 concepts? At all? Hmmmm, why not? 3 coordinators now. Same results..
I thought Russell and Shane Waldron were more on the same page today, and Russell was making the effort to take the open layups and move the chains. Am I wrong to give Russell (and Waldron) that credit for making adjustments, and it was really just that the 49ers ran defensive coverages and concepts that Russell knew how to read? Blame Raheem instead of credit Russ? Somewhere in between?Tical21":3p8ps2nv said:Russ was damn good today. He's so great when he gets coverages he is comfortable with. Thank you Raheem!
Both. Russell was much better today. Especially with his accuracy. But you'll notice on the strip sack, the other really bad sack late, the 2 yard quick passes where Dissly got hit quickly, were all against 2-deep. The 49ers had success in 2-deep and Russ was noticeably uncomfortable against it, which you can even see in his presnap body language, but the 49ers major in single-high safety, so I knew going in that we were going to get quite a bit of it. And Russ was much more comfortable and feasted. I was wondering whether the niners were going to run a lot more 2-deep than usual because of Russ' troubles against it as of late, or whether they'd stick to their typical gameplan. In the end, they ran a little more 2-deep than usual, but not much.olyfan63":2g5luitm said:I thought Russell and Shane Waldron were more on the same page today, and Russell was making the effort to take the open layups and move the chains. Am I wrong to give Russell (and Waldron) that credit for making adjustments, and it was really just that the 49ers ran defensive coverages and concepts that Russell knew how to read? Blame Raheem instead of credit Russ? Somewhere in between?Tical21":2g5luitm said:Russ was damn good today. He's so great when he gets coverages he is comfortable with. Thank you Raheem!
Tical21":khbklu7x said:Both. Russell was much better today. Especially with his accuracy. But you'll notice on the strip sack, the other really bad sack late, the 2 yard quick passes where Dissly got hit quickly, were all against 2-deep. The 49ers had success in 2-deep and Russ was noticeably uncomfortable against it, which you can even see in his presnap body language, but the 49ers major in single-high safety, so I knew going in that we were going to get quite a bit of it. And Russ was much more comfortable and feasted. I was wondering whether the niners were going to run a lot more 2-deep than usual because of Russ' troubles against it as of late, or whether they'd stick to their typical gameplan. In the end, they ran a little more 2-deep than usual, but not much.