hawknation2017
New member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
- Messages
- 1,812
- Reaction score
- 0
BostonBlackie":2l3pv59q said:nash72":2l3pv59q said:JTB":2l3pv59q said:As for the infamous play, the execution of the play by the WR's was the bigger fail than the call itself IMO. But that's football. You move on and each year stands on it's own. It's disappointing that some of the players and fans cannot do that.
The call was so bad and caused such an epic fail that the players and fans have every right to still be upset and torn about it. The biggest crime is nobody was held accountable for it. Sorry, but somebody needed to go for a failure of that magnitude. If somebody did get canned, the players might have moved past it, but here we are 2 years removed from it and its still causing ripples.
Look, enough of this, games don't come down to one play. For example, we didn't lose to the Giants twice because of those two end of game catches. We lost because we didn't put ourselves in position to absorb those plays.
The Patriots did lose to the Giants because of those two end-of-game catches. Those were game-defining plays that resulted in Giants' victories. They were not the sole cause of the Giants' victories, but they were a cause. In legal parlance, they were a "but for" cause of the Giants winning. Everything has multiple causes but certain events are conditions precedent to the end result.
That doesn't mean the Patriots deserve any less credit for their victory. In fact, the pick play demonstrated the true mastery of Bill Belichick. Most other coaches would have called a timeout in that situation to preserve time. But Belichick isn't like most other coaches.
He increased his own probability of victory by not calling a timeout, keeping the pressure of a ticking clock on the Seahawks, and forcing the Seahawks coaches to negotiate the balance between running enough time off the clock in case they scored quickly and preserving enough time to run four plays if needed.
This decision, in essence, shortened the Seahawks' playbook, reduced the chance of a high-probability running play, and increased the likelihood of a lower-probability quick pass to stop the clock. By their own admission, the Seahawks coaches explained after the fact that they believed they needed to throw the ball in order to preserve enough time to run up to four plays if they needed them.
Belichick also deserves a ton of credit for his player preparation. I believe Malcolm Butler was the one who said they had practiced this exact red zone "pick play" in practice during the lead up to the Super Bowl. The Seahawks had run the play in a different situation before. Based on their alignment and need for a quick pass to stop the clock, Belichick's tactical decision made the Seahawks much more predictable and less effective than you would expect from the #1 power offense vs. the #32 power defense. Once again, kudos to him. This is just one example -- one of many -- illustrating why he will go down as one of the best coaches in history.