vigilantgrrl
Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 196
- Reaction score
- 0
If he gets the carries, and I think he should start.....I think he will have more total yards than Leonard Fournette!
olyfan63":39zzug3m said:Carson is already showing he has "it" when it comes to running the rock. qjj The only real question is his ability to pick up the playbook and assignments, like way better than CMike. Can he pick up blitzers?
Davidess":izhbc4ai said:Its Pre-season. This is reminding me of the Pope hype last year (although I don't believe pope went against starters)
I am not debating whether Carson will be good or not but Fournette will be the vocal point of the Jags offense and Carson will be splitting time with Lacy, Rawls (if Healthy) Prosise (If healthy)
lets re-visit this in 4-5 months.
Missing_Clink":3ldnv4i7 said:Davidess":3ldnv4i7 said:Its Pre-season. This is reminding me of the Pope hype last year (although I don't believe pope went against starters)
I am not debating whether Carson will be good or not but Fournette will be the vocal point of the Jags offense and Carson will be splitting time with Lacy, Rawls (if Healthy) Prosise (If healthy)
lets re-visit this in 4-5 months.
Yea, Pope was about 5'7" and maybe 200 lbs doing it against 3rd stringers. Carson is a grown ass man who is holding his own against NFL starters. Give him the workload that Fournette is gonna get this year and his stats would be fantastic.
chris98251":2jzf0znh said:olyfan63":2jzf0znh said:Carson is already showing he has "it" when it comes to running the rock. The only real question is his ability to pick up the playbook and assignments, like way better than CMike. Can he pick up blitzers?
He has already proven all of that and then some, all you had to do is watch the games and read the write ups from practice. He was ahead of CMike after the first week of practice and CMike's 3 years in the league.
v1rotv2":1m5emb0b said:While I am intreged by Carson he still has to do it over and over again at the real game level. I think he will but I have been wrong before. Just ask the wife.
MontanaHawk05":7m30d5mm said:v1rotv2":7m30d5mm said:While I am intreged by Carson he still has to do it over and over again at the real game level. I think he will but I have been wrong before. Just ask the wife.
LOL. Well the good news about Carson is that he's bigger and presumably more durable than Rawls.
If he continues on his trajectory, I don't see him just making the roster, I see him forcing other RBs off the team out of redundancy. I'm perilously close to saying "complete package", and I think Seattle should give him the entirety of Game 4 to see how he handles the load.
Thepeelsessions":1ca6d9o7 said:MontanaHawk05":1ca6d9o7 said:v1rotv2":1ca6d9o7 said:While I am intreged by Carson he still has to do it over and over again at the real game level. I think he will but I have been wrong before. Just ask the wife.
LOL. Well the good news about Carson is that he's bigger and presumably more durable than Rawls.
If he continues on his trajectory, I don't see him just making the roster, I see him forcing other RBs off the team out of redundancy. I'm perilously close to saying "complete package", and I think Seattle should give him the entirety of Game 4 to see how he handles the load.
I agree about him getting a big workload in Oakland. They need to see what he can do with 15-20 touches, regardless if it's against starters it backups. If the Hawks only keep 4 RBs, Collins and Davis have no chance. Although, I don't think Rawls or Prosise should be automatic locks. Especially Prosise.
Does anyone remember what Rawls did in pre-season his rookie year? I can't remember at all, but he obviously did well. Does anyone remember specifics?
MontanaHawk05":3v05tegt said:Thepeelsessions":3v05tegt said:MontanaHawk05":3v05tegt said:v1rotv2":3v05tegt said:While I am intreged by Carson he still has to do it over and over again at the real game level. I think he will but I have been wrong before. Just ask the wife.
LOL. Well the good news about Carson is that he's bigger and presumably more durable than Rawls.
If he continues on his trajectory, I don't see him just making the roster, I see him forcing other RBs off the team out of redundancy. I'm perilously close to saying "complete package", and I think Seattle should give him the entirety of Game 4 to see how he handles the load.
I agree about him getting a big workload in Oakland. They need to see what he can do with 15-20 touches, regardless if it's against starters it backups. If the Hawks only keep 4 RBs, Collins and Davis have no chance. Although, I don't think Rawls or Prosise should be automatic locks. Especially Prosise.
Does anyone remember what Rawls did in pre-season his rookie year? I can't remember at all, but he obviously did well. Does anyone remember specifics?
He did what Carson is doing now. Only without anyone questioning his durability due to his size.
Yes.Thepeelsessions":2rjwxmty said:MontanaHawk05":2rjwxmty said:Thepeelsessions":2rjwxmty said:MontanaHawk05":2rjwxmty said:LOL. Well the good news about Carson is that he's bigger and presumably more durable than Rawls.
If he continues on his trajectory, I don't see him just making the roster, I see him forcing other RBs off the team out of redundancy. I'm perilously close to saying "complete package", and I think Seattle should give him the entirety of Game 4 to see how he handles the load.
I agree about him getting a big workload in Oakland. They need to see what he can do with 15-20 touches, regardless if it's against starters it backups. If the Hawks only keep 4 RBs, Collins and Davis have no chance. Although, I don't think Rawls or Prosise should be automatic locks. Especially Prosise.
Does anyone remember what Rawls did in pre-season his rookie year? I can't remember at all, but he obviously did well. Does anyone remember specifics?
He did what Carson is doing now. Only without anyone questioning his durability due to his size.
Was a lot of his damages against starting units?