Woof!!! Again, I'm just questioning the message. At no point did I say or insinuate that Earl isn't the best player in that secondary...nor did I state an opinion that the SHOULDN'T start. I questioned the 'always compete' message.
Earl is massively important to our team. He started this holdout rhetoric last year, hence the "two years" that I previously mentioned. That was a little misstated by me, as I understand this is his last year, and yes I understand the similarity of Walt's contract...but that situation was still different.
There's no need to attack me, or my love of the Seahawks. I thought we were all fans first. Apologies if you took me for a Rams fan or something.
I just think a light week of practice then jumping right into a starting gig doesn't necessarily wash the bad blood away from the situation, nor does it wash clean the feelings of some of his teammates.
I find it interesting, that's all...especially the way Bell's Steelers teammates are turning on him, rather than embracing his "business decision" to hold out. The bright side to that is that our players embrace and love Earl, while Pittsburgh's players seem to think he's a dick.
In the end, I love Earl Thomas, and if I were a coach I would start him any chance I got. But I also wouldn't waffle with the mantra I spewed, so that it wouldn't have the possibility of poisoning the water within the clubhouse.