ImTheScientist":2e8giakn said:
jake206":2e8giakn said:
Too short, would rather have Matthews.
You prefer WRs that can't get separation? Crazy.
If he can do that, while being covered as well as is claimed, then you bet I want him. He must have the best ball fighting skills of any collegiate player in history.
The truth is, he does get open. And he extends well, and fights for receptions very well. He is tough and takes hits. Doesn't exhibit alligator arms. Goes and gets the ball. And can run away from defenders in space.
It's a pretty gross exaggeration that he can't get separation. It's certainly not his strength -- like say a Jared Abbrederis. But he has other qualities that compensate for that.
As far as tools go, he has plenty. Speed, size, determination and a strong ability to develop. Attitude wise, he's pretty outstanding. I don't think it's exactly a surprise that Seattle has shown interest in him. I'd be shocked if he didn't interview well. It doesn't mean he's necessarily our guy we can't leave the draft without -- but I do think he's on our board and probably a lot higher than the separation critics might expect.
With Tate's departure, I would expect our profile for which WR we take early will now include guys that aren't simply big receivers. That opens up a lot of options. The pool is muddied now and it's less clear who will be on our board. I don't expect Cooks to be on it -- since he'd be duplicating roles that we have filled with Baldwin and Harvin. He's not really an outside receiver and Seattle has lost two of them. We seem set at the slot.