That's exactly the play I thought of when the Patriots were explaining that they saw the play coming. They said they practiced for that scenario, just like Shoeless Dick said after he broke on the ball against Houston.kearly":1mg3zmpf said:Wilson put it where it had to be. The defense knew the play was coming and broke on it. Very similar in concept to the play Sherman made against the Texans....
kearly":6v2gh0xv said:NFSeahawks628":6v2gh0xv said:Wilson didn't put it where he had to be.
He threw it a second early and too high.
A throw to his stomach and chest and were re-pete champs.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong.
As Pehawk says, the timing of the throw is designed and Wilson executed that timing exactly as planned. Wilson said himself he thought it would be a touchdown, and it would have been if not for the DB knowing it was coming and making an awesome play.
The location was perfect. It led the receiver and he would have caught it in stride if the safety doesn't gamble.
Even if Wilson knew what was going to happen and threw the ball a bit inside, Lockette probably doesn't hold on (he got drilled), and if he does, he'd down in bounds at the one yard line. No way he scores there. Watch that play and tell me how Lockette scores. Not possible. Maybe Dez Bryant or Gronk could score after taking a hit like that, but that's about it.
When you factor in to account Brandon Browner's familiarity with the play, the formation, how to recognize it, how to stop it, and the time we allowed him to diagnose it and tell Butler.... well then this was most assuredly the worst call in ever!Hawk_Nation":1lxk2hj3 said:Bad play call at that particular down & distance yes.
Ramfan128":2xwdhics said:A play call is never the cause of a lost football game. OC's do not throw interceptions. IMO, this one was on Wilson. And props to him for owning up to it..
Sgt. Largent":5anj47fp said:bandiger":5anj47fp said:You can explain it however you want but stats about Pats goaline defense against the run says otherwise.
So what, EVERY team that plays us plays to stop Lynch and our run game. How has that worked out for other teams?
It's about situational play calling, not going with some broad stats or personnel logic. Lynch had been going off the entire 2nd half, and just ran for 5 yards. The Pat's line was gassed and we had all the momentum.
You give him the ball with one timeout...........and you give it to him 100 out of 100 times. End of discussion, no more excuses or rationalization.
Hawkee":3kngsaoa said:Sgt. Largent":3kngsaoa said:bandiger":3kngsaoa said:You can explain it however you want but stats about Pats goaline defense against the run says otherwise.
So what, EVERY team that plays us plays to stop Lynch and our run game. How has that worked out for other teams?
It's about situational play calling, not going with some broad stats or personnel logic. Lynch had been going off the entire 2nd half, and just ran for 5 yards. The Pat's line was gassed and we had all the momentum.
You give him the ball with one timeout...........and you give it to him 100 out of 100 times. End of discussion, no more excuses or rationalization.
Even Brady knew this. Just look at his facial expression during the last minute of the game. He had a sinking feeling. And against this defense it he knew would be nearly impossible to get within FG range in less than 25 seconds.
Rat":32fxxdg9 said:Yes. Wilson put it in pretty much the only spot it could have been picked off.
Bevell can't be scapegoated for everything. Players have to execute.
SonicHawk":ywt7qztq said:I find myself to be a relatively rational fan when it comes to how a game is called (I'm a huge incompetent fool elsewhere).
However, that was clearly A) the wrong play call at the worst time and B) a horrible decision by Russ to throw it where he did.
When you're on the 1 yard line in the closing seconds of the Super Bowl and you have the best back in the NFL and you decide to get cute and try to trick someone -- you've made the worst call in the history of the NFL.
You don't pass there, you have enough time to run the ball 3 times in the face of a defense that hasn't stopped Lynch for a loss yet. This isn't rocket science. You lose or win with what got you there.
idahawks":m56q3jxo said:Bevell was trying to keep his options open for 3rd and 4th down. A pass play either wins or stops the clock which keeps all options open for 3rd and 4th down. A run play forces you to use a TO and then you are forced to pass on 3rd or run an hope you get in because the clock will most likely run out before you get to 4th down.
Bevell worried too much about preserving the clock and forgot about the risk of an int. The risk of an int on an inside slant is very low but probably the highest of any play in that situation. There is maybe a 1% chance that gets picked off. I agree it was a bad play call but I can see what he was thinking and why he did it.
I think blame should be shared equally between Wilson, bevel and Lockette. All three made mistakes that could have prevented the int.
Before the play I said they should give it to Lynch and they should have. I don't think there is any doubt if you give him 2 cracks at it he gets in. The blunder in play calling isn't necessarily a pass as much as its a quick timing pass inside where a pick is more likely than almost any other passing play in that area of the field.
volsunghawk":31l4vdzh said:Nope.
Read this from a Pats fan on another board: "Patriots opponents ran the ball from the 1 yd line 5 times this season and scored a TD every time."
According to Football Outsiders, Lynch had gained positive yardage on 22 of 24 rushes in the game.
There's no way we shouldn't have handed the ball to Lynch.
NorCalHawk12":3ixa2xjl said: