Popeyejones
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,525
- Reaction score
- 0
kidhawk":w5u8eph5 said:but if we set the price so steep that nobody would take the deal for a guy like Sherman, that in itself says a lot.
Ehh, I don't totally disagree, but I can also see it both ways.
Sherman is far and away most valuable to a team that's spending almost all of its time in Cover 3, and you can count those teams in the NFL on one hand.
Part of the hangup could simply be that Sherman is simply more valuable to the Seahawks than he is to 28 or so of their potential trading partners.
That's not a knock on Sherman, not a knock on the Hawks, and not a knock on anyone else either. It's a simple scheme and value thing that you can't really get around.